节点文献
国际河流“共有财产”的语境审视与重构——以人类命运共同体理论为视角
Contextual Examination and Reconstruction on the Common Property in the International River Context: from the Perspective of a Community of Shared Future for Mankind
【Author】 SHAO Shuai;School of Law, Hunan Normal University;
【机构】 湖南师范大学法学院;
【摘要】 国际河流"准公共物品"的性质缺陷给清晰表述治理语境带来了障碍,"共有财产"是其中一种语境范式。然而,由于该表述是根据法律名词、公共信托理论等框架的直接嵌套,这一语境同人类命运共同体生态治理理念相比,存在边界模糊、权属不明、导向偏离等学理支撑不足的困境。同时,国家主权与共有产权的混杂造成的"共赢"障碍,以及机制建构与利益衡平的差序导致的"共治"障碍,致使流域沿岸国合作治理体系分散。表里两个层次的语境适用障碍需要全新的思维加以改造,人类命运共同体理念可以提供中国方案,"块茎思维"可以基于其理论生长性、异质多元性、相向延伸性应用于包括国际河流治理在内的人类生态协作治理体系,并提供方法论指导。
【Abstract】 The absence of "quasi-public goods" in international rivers has led to differences in clearly expressing the formulation of governance, among which "common property" is one of the contextual paradigms. However, the ecological governance concept of the community of human destiny has a dilemma of rigid theoretical basis, such as fuzzy boundary, unclear ownership and deviation of direction due to imposed the expression to the context. At the same time, the obstacle of win-win strategy caused by the mixture of national sovereignty and shared property rights, as well as the "co-governance" obstacle caused by the difference between mechanism construction and interest equity, lead to the disorder of the cooperative governance system of the basin and the coastal countries. The external and internal barriers indicate a new way of thinking as the core. The Rhizome Thought, developed by the concept of a community of shared future for mankind, can provide Chinese solutions and share Chinese wisdom for international river governance based on its theoretical growth, heterogeneity and pluralism and mutual extension.
【Key words】 International River; Common Property; A Community of Shared Future for Mankind; Multi-actor Governance;
- 【会议录名称】 中国法学会环境资源法学研究会2021年会暨2021年全国环境资源法学研讨会论文集——议题二:黄河保护立法的理论基础
- 【会议名称】中国法学会环境资源法学研究会2021年会暨2021年全国环境资源法学研讨会
- 【会议时间】2021-10-16
- 【会议地点】中国山西太原
- 【分类号】D99
- 【主办单位】中国法学会环境资源法学研究会、山西大学