【作者】 杜林致； 郑钟昊；

【Author】 DU Linzhi;JEONG Jong-Ho;Department of Social Psychology,Nankai University;Graduate School of International Studies,Seoul National University;

【机构】 南开大学社会心理学系； 韩国首尔大学国际大学院；

【摘要】 运用《个人传统性和个人现代性量表》和《腐败归因问卷》,选取261名中国大学生和234名韩国大学生为对象,调查分析中韩两国大学生的文化取向、对中韩官员腐败归因的因素、维度之间的差异,以及他们的文化取向与腐败归因之间的关系。研究发现:第一,在"孝亲敬祖、男性优越、平权开放、乐观进取"文化因素上,中国大学生的得分显著高于韩国大学生;而在"遵从权威、安分守成、独立自顾、尊重情感"文化因素上,韩国大学生的得分则显著高于中国大学生。第二,在腐败归因因素上,韩国大学生更多地把官员腐败归因于个人因素,比如"自私、贪财的人性,个人道德品行低下,回报曾经帮助自己的人,一时的贪念"等;而中国大学生则把官员腐败更多地归因于外在的环境因素,比如"政商勾结的国内体制,反腐法律、制度不健全,腐败风气"等。第三,在腐败归因维度上,韩国大学生比中国大学生更倾向于内在的、不稳定的、不可控的因素;而中国大学生比韩国大学生更倾向于可控因素。第四,遵从权威、孝亲敬祖、宿命自保、独立自顾四种文化取向对中韩大学生的官员腐败归因模式有调节作用。更多还原

【Abstract】 Based on two questionnaires,Scale of Individual Traditionalism and Individual Modernism designed by Yang Guoshu and Questionnaire on the Attribution to Corruption designed by ourselves,this paper surveyed 261 randomly-selected college students in China and 234 randomly-selected college students in South Korea in order to analyze the difference of cultural trends,the difference of attributional factors and dimension between college students in China and college students inSouth Korea,and the relation between cultural trends and attribution to official corruption of them.The following results were found:first,the subjects attributed official corruption to internal and controlled factors such as "low morality" and "Anti-corruption is just a slogan and means of the politicians in the election campaign",or external,stable and controlled factors such as "anti-corruption laws and system","domestic institution" and "corruption atmosphere";second,there is group-serving bias between the attributions for corruptions of officials in China and South Korea;third,students with traditional ideas prefer to attribute official corruption to uncontrolled and unchanged factors,whereas students with modern ideas prefer to attribute official corruption to stable and controlled factors.更多还原