【作者】 何子张； 李渊；

【机构】 厦门大学城市规划系； 东南大学建筑学院；

【摘要】 在城市化过程中对农村集体土地征用的赔偿和农民权利的维护,一直是理论界争论的焦点。分析了农村集体土地发展权划分的主要论点:涨价归公论、涨价归私论和二元主体论,提出国家和农村集体应共享农地发展权。农村集体土地自发流转就是农民争取农地发展权益的表现形式。其中,将集体建设用地发展权划归农村集体,而"农村预留地"模式是在征地城市化中按比例返还征地农村建设用地,实质上是地方政府和被征地农村对土地发展权的再分配。厦门"金包银"工程实践证明,如果没有政府统一规划和运作,即使将农地发展权划归农民,但仅仅依靠农民个体的运作,同样难以保障农民的长远利益,也无法遏制"城中村"现象的蔓延。更多还原

【Abstract】 The discussion on the issues of compensation for rural collective land requisition and protection for farmer’s right under the circumstance of urbanization has always been the focus in theoretic field. This paper analyzes the main points of the development right division for rural collective land, including public appreciation theory, private appreciation theory and dual-subject theory, and suggests that the state and the collectives should share the development right for rural land. It believes that the automatic conversion of rural collective land is the main type of striving for the development rights of rural land for the farmers. Besides, the way of allocating the development right of collective construction land to rural collective and making restitution the rural construction land with a certain ratio under the model of "Rural Reserves" is, in fact, a re-allocation process of the land development rights by local government and rural land in land requisition. The "Gold Rimming Silver" Project of Xiamen City has also testified the difficulty of ensuring the long-term rights of the farmers as well as the containment of the sprawl for "City Village" phenomena with only the operation from single farmer but without the unified planning and operation from government.更多还原