【作者】 马欣伯； 张素梅；

【Author】 MA Xin-bo ZHANG Su-mei (School of Civil Engineering,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150090,China)

【机构】 哈尔滨工业大学土木工程学院；

【摘要】 对美国 AISC-LRFD(99)规程、欧洲 Eurocode 4(ECA-94)规程、日本 AIJ 规程以及中国 JCJ 01-89 规程、CECS 规程、DL/T 5085-1999规程、中国福建 DBJ 13-51-2003规程等七部国内外典型圆钢管混凝土规程中轴压构件承载力设计公式的特点及计算结果进行较为详细地比较,同时检验了在各部规程参数限制条件下,计算结果与搜集到的658个国内外试验数据的吻合程度.更多还原

【Abstract】 The design methods and calculated results of concrete-filled steel circular tubes(CFST)in seven different codes worldwide are compared in detail,which include American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)——Load and Resistance Factor Design specification for structural steel buildings(LRFD),Europe- an Committee for Standardization(CEN)Eurocode 4——Design of composite steel and concrete structures ——Part 1.1:General rules and rules for buildings,Architectural Institute of Japan(AIJ)——Recommen- dations for design and construction of concrete filled steel tubular structures,Chinese JCJ 01-89 code,CECS code,DL/T 5085-1999 code and DBJ 13-51-2003 code.The comparisons between the results calculated by each code,under the limitation of parameters,and 658 experimental results collected from worldwide refer- ences are carried out,from which the degrees of approach of each codes are tested.更多还原