【作者】 徐燕；

【导师】 邓湘树；

【作者基本信息】 西南财经大学 ， 社会工作， 2025， 硕士

【摘要】 十六届六中全会提出建设一支宏大的社会工作人才队伍,社会工作长期主要发挥民生服务的功能。随着十八届三中全会提出由社会管理向社会治理转型,倡导建立共建共治共享的社会治理格局,愈发需要社会力量参与治理,以应对日益明显的基层治理问题,并形成多元主体的协同共治的格局。社会工作作为重要的社会力量,自西方引入中国的几十年,参与基层社会治理是其本土化职责之一,也是专业发展的本土化路径。2023年中央社会工作部成立,进一步推动社会工作将基层社会治理作为新的专业发展方向。本文以文献研究法和个案研究法为研究方法,在中国的政治导向和社会工作已有的本土经验基础上,从功能视角出发,围绕“治理”功能提出治理型社会工作,对治理型社会工作做一个初步的、综合的探索性研究。将我党的群众工作理论、西方社会工作相关治理理论和本土治理实践经验作为治理型社会观在的理论基础。接下来,本文在已有研究的基础上和功能主义视角下,对治理型社会工作进行了界定,并分析了其特征和边界,并从实践开展的多个角度对治理型社会工作和服务型社会工作进行差异性分析,以进一步阐述治理型社会工作的相关特点。在此基础上,本文结合政策指导与专业实践发展,指出治理型社会工作可以进一步探索的四大实践领域,分别是信访社会工作、物业社会工作、网络社会工作、“三新”群体服务,结合个案访谈资料,探索性指出治理型社会工作在这四大实践领域可如何推动矛盾化解。但进一步研究得知,由于环境、专业自身等方面的因素,目前发展治理型社会工作在法规制度、功能角色、行业能力、介入路径方面存在阻碍。接下来需要从多角度探索发展治理型社会工作的路径,需要社会工作界各专家学者、一线工作者共同出谋划策。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since the Third Plenum of the 18th Central Committee proposed the transformation from social management to social governance,the power of social governance has become increasingly important,advocating the establishment of a social governance pattern of co construction,co governance,and sharing.However,the current grassroots governance problems have become increasingly prominent,with high governance costs and low vitality.There is an urgent need for social forces to participate in social governance and form a pattern of collaborative co governance.Since the Sixth Plenary Session of the 16th Central Committee proposed the construction of a grand social work talent team,social work has long mainly played a role in serving people’s livelihoods.Social work has been introduced from the West to China for decades,and has been exploring the localization development of social work and the practical path of social work.With the establishment of the Central Ministry of Social Work in 2023,researchers have continuously pointed out that social work needs to take participation in social governance as a new professional development direction and positioning,truly opening up the path of localization in China.This article uses literature research and semi-structured interview methods,combined with the existing local experience of China’s political landscape and social work,to propose governance oriented social work from the perspective of functional analysis,focusing on the"governance"function,and to conduct a preliminary and comprehensive exploratory study on governance oriented social work.This article introduces our party’s theory of mass work into governance oriented social work and serves as one of the important theories for practical guidance.Next,based on existing research and from a functionalist perspective,this article defines governance based social work,analyzes its characteristics,boundaries,and unique advantages,and compares governance based social work with service-oriented social work to further explain the relevant characteristics of governance based social work.On this basis,this article combines policy needs and academic research needs to propose five practical areas in which governance based social work can be explored as a social force,namely community social work,petition social work,property social work,network social work,and"three new"group services.Based on the analysis of interview data,the main functions of governance based social work in these five areas are preliminarily explored.However,further research has revealed that due to factors such as the environment and the profession itself,there are obstacles to the development of governance oriented social work in terms of regulatory systems,functional roles,industry capabilities,and intervention pathways.Next,it is necessary to explore the path of developing governance oriented social work through multi-faceted practice,and require experts,scholars,and frontline workers in the social work community to jointly provide advice and strategies.更多还原