节点文献
世界女排强队攻防技战术效果的定量研究
Quantitative Research on the Offensive and Defensive Effects of the World Women’s Volleyball Team
【作者】 杨明;
【作者基本信息】 鲁东大学 , 体育硕士(专业学位), 2025, 硕士
【摘要】 奥运会作为全世界规模最大的综合体育赛事,最具影响力的体育盛会,展现了各类运动项目的顶尖竞技实力。回顾中国女排11次征战奥运会历程,几经沉浮,几次夺冠站上最高领奖台,又几次跌落神坛。2024年巴黎奥运会中国女排止步八强,未能完成既定目标,反映出队伍技战术不稳定、缺乏整体性等诸多问题。为了探索中国女排与世界女排顶级球队之间的差距,论文以世界女排强队攻防技战术效果为研究对象,定量分析并多维度剖析世界女排强队之间的攻防技战术效果,以期找到中国女排的差距,取长补短,为中国女排提高攻防技战术水平提供数据支持,推动中国女排在奥运赛场再创辉煌。研究方法:采用文献资料法、录像观察法、技术统计法、数理统计法以及WSRS综合分析法。对2024年巴黎奥运会女排八强队伍全部15场比赛中的攻防技战术效果进行定量研究,通过比较中国女排与世界女排强队在技术效果、进攻转为防守效果、防守转为进攻效果以及整体攻防效果等方面的数据,全面分析中国女排在国际顶级赛事中的技战术运用效果,深入剖析在比赛中的优势与不足,从而精准界定中国女排与世界强队女排队伍之间实力差距。主要研究结论如下:一、技术运用效果方面:在发球技术上,中国女排发球稳定,失误率最低,但发球威胁性不足,发球破攻率(4.5%)和破战术效率(23.0%);发球一般效率高达(63.1%),超过其他七支队伍;在传球层面,传球后不能进攻效率(4.7%)位于第六位,在0-1人拦网率(4.0%)位列第四,传球隐蔽性一般。在进攻层面,中国女排得分率(33.6%)位列第六,与意大利(37.8%)、美国(37.0%)、巴西(38.8%)存在较大的差距。另外,在进攻被拦防起能攻率(20.2%)排名第七位,凸显出攻击能力较弱。在防守技术上,中国女排接发球到位率(33.6%)和半到位率(32.2%)分别位列第一、第三,但无攻率(6.7%)与失误率(6.0%)分别位列第一、第三,接发球稳定性较差。在拦防技术上,中国女排拦网有效率(64.1%)效果较好,但防守起球率(45.5%)效果不理想,排名第四位。二、在攻防转换方面:在进攻转为防守(攻→防)方面:通过WRSR综合评价法对中国女排与奥运八强其他7支队伍对比分析,中国女排RSR值为0.625,位列第四。中国女排发球后转为防守,拦网效果综合vote值(216.2分)和接扣球综合vote值(268.4分),均列第五;中国女排在进攻后被拦回保护起球综合vote值155.8分、进攻后转为接扣球综合vote180.7分,均排在第四位,导致中国女排在“攻→防”环节整体效果表现较弱,处于2档水平。在防守转为进攻(防→攻)方面:较于八强队伍其他7支队伍对比分析发现,中国女排RSR值为0.541,位列八强第五。中国女排接发球后转为进攻综合vote值(268.6分)和接扣球后转为进攻综合vote值(197.9分),均列第三位;中国女排在接拦回球后转为进攻综合vote值为184.9分,位列第八。主要归咎于一传到位率低、二传队员传球集中、一攻防反以及保攻得分率低。导致中国女排在“防→攻”环节处于2档水平。三、在攻防效果方面:在本次巴黎奥运会意大利女排攻防卓越居A级水平球队,巴西、美国女排属B级水平球队,中国女排与塞维亚女排以及土耳其女排攻防效果RSR值均为0.542,并列第四。根据量化指标各项技术水平存在一定差距,中国女排需针对发球、传球等环节加强训练,并积累实战经验,提升综合实力,以期未来大赛中取得佳绩。
【Abstract】 Olympics as the world’s largest comprehensive sports events,the most powerful sports event,showing the top competitive advantages of all kinds of sports.Review of the Chinese women’s volleyball team’s 11 trips to the Olympics.,they have gone through ups and downs,winning several championships and standing on the highest podium,and falling off the pedestal several times.The 2024 Paris Olympics saw China’s women’s volleyball team stop in the last eight.which reflects the instability of the team’s skills and tactics,the lack of integrity and many other problems.In For exploring the gap between the Chinese women’s volleyball team and the best teams in the world,The thesis is a study of the technical and tactical effects of offense and defense of the world’s strongest women’s volleyball teams,and quantitative analysis and multi-dimensional analysis of the technical and tactical effects of offense and defense of the world’s strongest women’s volleyball teams,with a view to finding the gap between the Chinese women’s volleyball team and making up for the shortcomings of the long and the shortcomings of the shortcomings of the long and the short,in order to improve the Chinese women’s volleyball team’s offense and defense techniques and tactics level to provide data support and to promote the Chinese women’s volleyball team to make another glorious victory in the Olympic Games.The method of research:literature approach,video observation method,technique statistics method,mathematical statistics method and WSRS comprehensive methods of analysis were used.Conduct quantitative research on the offensive and defensive technical and tactical effects of all 15 matches of the top eight women’s volleyball teams of the 2024 Paris Olympics,and by comparing the data of China’s women’s volleyball team with those of the world’s strongest women’s volleyball teams in terms of the effects of the use of the technology,the effects of the offense into the defense,the effects of the defense into the attack,as well as the effects of the overall offensive and defense,we will comprehensively analyze the effects of Chinese women’s volleyball team’s technical and tactical application in the international top tournaments,deeply analyze the advantages and shortcomings in the games,so as to accurately define the strength gap between Chinese women’s volleyball team and the world’s strongest women’s volleyball team.1.In terms of technical application effectiveness:The Chinese women’s volleyball team has a stable serve and the lowest error rate in terms of serving technology,but the threat of serving is insufficient.The serving efficiency is generally as high as 63.1%,surpassing the other seven teams;Service breakthrough rate(4.5%)and tactical efficiency(23.0%).The Chinese women’s volleyball team had the highest rate of passing errors(2.4%)in the passing game.sixth place in the efficiency of not being able to attack after passing(4.7%),fourth place in the 0-1 block rate(4.0%),and average pass concealment.On offense,the score rate of the Chinese women’s volleyball team(33.6%)ranked sixth,with a big gap with Italy(37.8%),the United States(37.0%)and Brazil(38.8%).In addition,it ranks seventh in the ability to attack when blocked by defense(20.2%),highlighting its weak attacking ability.In the defense technology,Chinese women’s volleyball team ranked first and third in the receiving and serving in place rate(33.6%)and half in place rate(32.2%),but the no attack rate(6.7%)and error rate(6.0%)ranked first and third,and the stability of receiving and serving was poor.In blocking technology,Chinese women’s volleyball team blocking effective rate(64.1%)is better,but the defense of the balls up rate(45.5%)is not ideal,ranked fourth.2.In terms of offensive and defensive transitions:In the attack to defense(attack→defense):Comparing and analyzing the Chinese women’s volleyball team with the other 7 teams in the top 8 of the Olympic Games through the WRSR comprehensive evaluation method.the Chinese women’s volleyball team ranked fourth with an RSR value of 0.625.The integrated VOTE value of blocking effect(216.2 points)and the integrated VOTE value of catching and dunking(268.4 points)of the Chinese women’s volleyball team ranked the fifth after they switched to defense after serving the ball;The Chinese women’s volleyball team’s attack was intercepted to protect the ball,with a comprehensive vote value of 155.8points,ranking third;Volleyball team of China in the attack after being blocked back to protect the starting point of the integrated vote value of 155.8 points,after the attack to turn to catch and dunk the integrated vote of 180.7 points,are ranked fourth.resulting in the overall effect of the Chinese women’s volleyball team in the"attack→defense"link performance is weaker,at the level of the 2 grade team.In terms of transitioning from defense to offense(defense→attack),Compared with the other seven teams in the top eight,the comparison analysis found that the Chinese women’s volleyball team had an RSR value of 0541,ranking 5rd in the top eight.After receiving the serve,the Chinese women’s volleyball team converted it into an offensive comprehensive vote value(268.6 points),and after receiving the spike,it converted it into an offensive comprehensive vote value(197.9 points),both ranking third;The Chinese women’s volleyball team switched to attacking after receiving the ball,with a comprehensive vote value of 184.9 points,ranking eighth Mainly attributed to low pass rate,concentrated passing by the setter,counter attack and defense,and the low scoring rate of the protection attack.The Chinese team is at the level of a 2-stage team in the"defense→attack"section.3.In terms of offensive and defensive effectiveness:At the Paris Olympics,the Italian women’s volleyball team achieved outstanding offensive and defensive performance,ranking as an A-level team,while the Brazilian and American were B-level teams.Chinese women’s volleyball team tied for fourth place with Serbian women’s volleyball team and Turkish women’s volleyball team with RSR value of 0.542 for offense and defense effects.According to quantitative indicators,there is a certain gap in various technical levels.The Chinese women’s volleyball team needs to strengthen training in serving,passing and other aspects,accumulate practical experience,improve comprehensive strength,in order to achieve good results in future competitions.
- 【网络出版投稿人】 鲁东大学 【网络出版年期】2026年 07期
- 【分类号】G842