【作者】 李敏；

【导师】 张建华；

【作者基本信息】 西北师范大学 ， 体育教育训练学， 2024， 硕士

【摘要】 2016年,习近平总书记在全国哲学社会科学工作座谈会上提出“构建中国特色哲学社会科学”。2022年,习近平总书记考察中国人民大学时强调,“加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学,归根揭底是建构中国自主的知识体系”。这一论断将自主知识体系定为新时代中国特色哲学社会科学发展的核心,为推动中国哲学社会科学发展指明了方向。构建自主知识体系,需要理清中国学者在各自学科的贡献、原创性理论以及学术共同体的发展状况。作为体育学的本源性分支学科,运动训练学本土化发展已有70多年历史,中国学者提出了“三从一大”训练原则、项群训练理论、一元训练理论等原创性理论,推动了学科的发展。新时代如何构建中国特色运动训练学自主知识体系,是学术共同体必须面对的时代课题。任何一门学科的发展,必须依赖该领域智力活动主体聚合而成的学术共同体,才能实现知识体系的完善与创新发展。缘于此,本文以中国运动训练学学术共同体为研究对象,综合运用文献资料法、数理统计法、社会网络分析法等研究方法,对学术共同体进行发现、识别,并考察该共同体的发展局势,探讨发展的内在逻辑,为推动中国运动训练学自主知识体系构建和学术共同体建设提供参考。通过研究,得出以下结论:1.运动训练学学术共同体是探索运动训练的本质与规律过程中聚合起来的一个学术群体,是学科发展的中流砥柱。中国运动训练学发展中,形成了以田麦久为代表的学术共同体,形成了运动训练学研究领域的“中国流”。2.根据普莱斯定律,测算出中国运动训练学学术共同体的最低发文量为6篇,共有50位研究者进入核心作者群。通过合著网络分析,发现作者合著关系网络密度为0.0759,网络整体较为松散;通过关键词耦合网络分析,发现网络密度超过合著网络,表明运动训练学学术共同体在基本的训练知识体系上达成共识;通过引文网络分析,发现田麦久的学术观点占据网络中心,具有很高的权威。3.中国运动训练学学术共同体生成路径相对单一,早期主要有国外留学回国作者群体、本土训练实践研究者群体2种;后期的生成路径主要来源于师承关系,围绕训练学研究方向形成了硕士、博士学术群。4.中国运动训练学学术共同体成员大多数来自国内体育学博士点单位及部分海外博士培养单位,研究涉及到训练基本理论、竞技能力结构与训练、竞技参赛等领域,生产出了“三从一大”训练原则、项群训练理论、一元训练理论、竞技能力非衡补偿理论、峰前状态理论、竞技能力系统网络结构等原创性成果。5.学术共同体与学科的命运是紧密相连,构建中国运动训练学自主知识体系应以知识生产为导向,抛弃内部领地之争,广纳更多研究者进入共同体,才能推动学科快速发展。为此提出以下建议:减少外界因素的影响,坚守学术共同体的初心与使命;加强学术合作和交流,打破“圈子”壁垒,走向统一发展的道路;强化训练学者的学术观念,实现学术共同体的价值回归。更多还原

【Abstract】 In 2016,General Secretary Xi Jinping proposed"Building philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics"at the National Forum on Philosophy and Social Sciences Work.In 2022,when General Secretary Xi Jinping visited Renmin University of China,he stressed that"accelerating the construction of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics is to build China’s independent knowledge system in the final analysis".This conclusion defines the independent knowledge system as the core of the development of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics in the new era,and points out the direction for promoting the development of philosophy and social sciences in China.To build an independent knowledge system,it is necessary to clarify the contributions of Chinese scholars in their respective disciplines,original theories and the development of the academic community.As the original branch discipline of sports science,sports training has developed indigenously for more than 70 years.Chinese scholars have put forward original theories such as the principle"that training should be hard,strict,geared to the needs of actual combat and with heavy load",the training theory of sports groups,and the unitary training theory,forming a"Chinese stream"in the field of sports training science research.How to build the independent knowledge system of sports training with Chinese characteristics in the new era is an issue that the academic community must face.The development of any discipline must rely on the academic community formed by the aggregation of the subject of intellectual activities in the field,so as to realize the perfection and innovative development of the knowledge system.For this reason,this paper takes the Chinese academic community of sports training as the research object,comprehensively uses research methods such as literature,mathematical statistics and social network analysis to discover and identify the academic community,investigate the development situation of the community,and explore the internal logic of development.It provides a reference for promoting the construction of independent knowledge system and academic community of sports training in China.Through the research,the following conclusions are drawn:1.The academic community of sports training is an academic group gathered in the process of exploring the nature and rules of sports training,and is the mainstay of the development of the discipline.During the development of sports training science in China,the academic community represented by Tian Maijiu has formed,and the"Chinese flow"in the field of sports training research has been formed.2.According to Price’s law,it is calculated that the minimum number of papers published in the academic community of sports training in China is 6,and a total of 50researchers have entered the core author group.Through the analysis of the co-authorship network,it is found that the network density of the co-authorship relationship is 0.0759,and the whole network is loose.Through the keyword coupling network analysis,it is found that the network density exceeds the co-authored network,which indicates that the academic community of sports training has reached a consensus on the basic training knowledge system.Through the citation network analysis,it is found that Tian Maijiu’s academic views occupy the center of the network and have a high authority.3.The formation path of the sports training academic community in China is relatively simple.In the early stage,there are mainly two groups:overseas study author group and local training practice researcher group;The later generation path mainly comes from the mentoring relationship,and the academic groups of master and doctor are formed around the research direction of training science.4.Most of the members of China’s sports training academic community come from the domestic physical education doctoral institutions and some overseas doctoral training institutions,and the research involves the basic theory of training,competitive ability structure and training,competitive participation and other fields.It has produced original achievements such as"three from one"training principle,event group training theory,unitary training theory,unbalanced compensation theory of competitive ability,pre-peak state theory,network structure of competitive ability system,etc.5.The fate of the academic community and the discipline are closely linked,and the construction of the independent knowledge system of sports training in China should be guided by knowledge production,abandon internal territorial disputes,and attract more researchers into the community,so as to promote the rapid development of the discipline.Therefore,the following suggestions are put forward:reduce the influence of external factors and stick to the original intention and mission of the academic community;Strengthen academic cooperation and exchange,break the barrier of"circle",and move towards the road of unified development;Strengthen the training of scholars’academic concepts and realize the return of the value of academic community.更多还原