【作者】 王蕾；

【导师】 余来明；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 古代文学， 2023， 硕士

【副题名】明代《孟浩然诗集》的刊刻与评点研究

【摘要】 孟浩然诗作以五言为主,多乘兴起笔,抒发潇洒磊落之性情。在明以前,论诗者多将诗品系诸人品,因怜惜其终身未仕,而以“清绝”将孟诗风格概而论之,并未给予格外关注和尊崇。孟浩然被列为盛唐经典作家,尤其五律被认为是“盛唐之最”则与明代有密切关联。本文即以明代孟浩然诗的经典化作为主题,分文献与文学两方面进行研究。第一章,即关于明刊《孟浩然诗集》的版本考证。在现存十多个版本的《孟浩然诗集》中,以明刻本数量最多,且对当代编定的孟浩然诗集影响最大。现存的九种明刻本《孟浩然诗集》,在收诗数量、编次、诗题等方面都存在较大不同,诗歌正文也互有异同,总体上可以分为三个系统:一、宋蜀本,二、元刻刘辰翁评点本,三、明刻唐诗十二家本。前两个系统的版本虽然都渊源于前代,但明人也并非只是简单翻刻,而是多有更易,包括校勘字句、调整编次、增入新诗等方式。后一个系统的版本则是在统合各本基础上形成的新本,是后来通行本《孟浩然诗集》的主要来源。第二章至第四章,即主要讨论明代对孟浩然诗经典评价、经典作品选录,以及孟浩然在唐诗谱系中地位形成起到的作用。在元刻刘辰翁评点本《孟浩然诗集》基础上,明中后期先后刊行了几种署名李梦阳、袁宏道参评的本子,此时的唐诗选本中收孟诗数量较前代也大大增加。这些评本、选本展现出多方观点的碰撞交锋,而且逐句、逐篇的点评方式,带动了明人对孟浩然诗作更精微深入的探讨,更影响了清人乃至近现代读者对孟诗的一般印象。孟浩然诗在明代的批评历程,与当时诗学观念发展的总体脉络之间,形成了紧密的联系。因此,可将诗学批评系统中孟诗评价的升降作为典型个案,以观照明代在整个中国古典时期经典作家地位形成进程中的重要意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 Meng Haoran is typically referred to as a’nature poet.’His landscape poetry typically consist of four five-character phrases,the majority of which represent his genuine emotions.Prior to the Ming dynasty,the majority of poetry reviewers pity Meng Haoran for his lifetime incapacity to become an official,and as a result,they generalize his poetic style with the label"Qing Jie,"just giving Meng Haoran’s poems very little consideration.Meng Haoran is known as the representative writer of the High-Tang period,and his rhythmic poems are regarded as the finest,according to Ming dynasty scholars.On the classicization of Meng Haoran’s poems during the Ming Dynasty,this paper is divided into two sections:a documentary research and a literary study.In the first chapter,we shall investigate the Ming Dynasty editions of Meng Haoran’s poems.Among the more than ten extant editions of Meng Haoran’s poetry,the Ming engraved versions are the most prevalent and have had the largest impact on modern editions.The nine extant Ming engraved editions of Meng Haoran’s poems differ greatly in the number of poems collected,the number of editions,the titles of the poems,and the bodies of the poems,and can be roughly divided into three systems:first,the Sichuan edition in the Song dynasty,the earliest edition that has been preserved;second,Liu Chenweng’s appraisal edition in the Yuan dynasty;and third,the anthology of poems by 12 poets in the Tang dynasty,published in the Ming dynasty.Although the editions of the first two systems stemmed from the previous generation,the Ming did not just reprint them;rather,they made numerous modifications,such as editing the words and phrases,modifying the sequence,and so on.The most important source for the later versions of Meng Haoran’s poems is a new system of editions based on the unification of several texts.The second through fourth chapters examine the Ming dynasty’s classical judgment of Meng Haoran’s poetry,the selection of classical works,and Meng Haoran’s involvement in establishing his position in the genealogy of Tang poetry.During the Ming era,Liu Chenweng’s comments on Meng Haoran’s poems circulated for a long time and were widely disseminated.Liu’s remarks altered the expectations of the Ming people.Many times during the early and middle Ming dynasties,Liu Chenweng’s appraisal edition was revised and reissued.The literati and publishers of the late Ming dynasty used the anthology of poems by 12 poets from the Tang dynasty to create new versions.One of the notable many editions is Li Mengyang’s appraisal edition.The assessment edition by Yuan Hongdao is a second option.The criticisms of both individuals were founded on that of Liu Chenweng.During this period,the number of Meng poems included in Tang poetry anthologies increased significantly in comparison to the preceding generation.These analyses and anthologies demonstrated the conflict of numerous viewpoints,and the sentence-by-sentence and chapter-by-chapter commentary prompted the Ming to delve more deeply into Meng Haoran’s poetry and affected the Qing and even modern readers of Meng’s poems.The critical history of Meng Haoran’s poems during the Ming dynasty developed a direct relationship between them and the general trend of conceptual poetic development at that time.Hence,the rise and fall of Meng’s poems in the system of poetic criticism can be viewed as a typical example of the significance of the Ming Dynasty in the formation of the status of classical poets throughout the classical Chinese period.更多还原