节点文献
城镇集中安置型易地扶贫搬迁社区公共文化服务问题研究
A Study on Public Cultural Services in Urban Centrally Resettled Relocation Communities for Poverty Alleviation
【作者】 孙娟;
【导师】 曹艳春;
【作者基本信息】 云南大学 , 公共管理(MPA)(专业学位), 2023, 硕士
【副题名】以昭通市鲁甸县J安置区为例
【摘要】 昭通曾作为全国贫困人口、易地扶贫搬迁人口最多的地级市,地区的文化建设不仅是公共文化服务体系建设的一个重要方面,同样承载着云南省甚至是全国走向富裕和发达的重要使命。易地搬迁安置区公共文化服务问题的研究,对提高政府管理公共事务的能力、提高公共文化服务提供的效能有现实的意义,对接续乡村振兴政策也有着重要的意义。本文基于公共文化的视角,以城镇型的易地扶贫搬迁社区为对象,采用了案例分析、文献研究、实地调查等研究方法,对社区公共文化服务体系建设进行了研究。城镇型易地扶贫搬迁社区作为一个“历史产物”,相较于建设初期而言不断地得到提升,但同时仍存在一些问题。其中有与非搬迁社区一样的公共文化服务领域类似的问题,例如地方政府可用于公共文化服务的提供的资金有限,社区可用于专门提供公共文化服务的人手短缺,除此以外,有作为搬迁安置社区的特性问题:公共文化服务的提供与迁出地文化衔接不紧密,公共文化服务的方式固化,居民找不到对应的表达途径,沟通渠道不畅通等。本文以“搬迁社区”的背景结合以上问题为切入点,分析产生问题的主要原因:首先是相较于经济建设而言,政府对于文化建设的重视程度还不够,公共文化服务建设没有成为政府的主体工作,因此导致了相应领域的经费支出有限、倾斜不足,其次缺乏对易地搬迁迁出地和迁入地本地特色公共文化的挖掘,导致公共文化服务的体制机制与搬迁型的城镇社区不相匹配,再其次欠缺多方面社会力量的参与。针对公共文化服务提供存在的问题,本文提出了相应的对策及建议:一是不断加强对公共文化服务建设的重视,增加资金的投入;二是基于搬迁背景优化配选文化建设的队伍;三是提供与迁出地、迁入地文化紧密结合的丰富的公共文化服务;四是利用多平台、多渠道为社区居民提供发声的方式;五是不断完善多元公共文化服务治理的结构。
【Abstract】 Zhaotong used to be the prefecture-level city with the largest population of poor people and relocated people.The region’s cultural construction not only plays a significant role in the development of the public cultural service system,but also plays a significant role in the mission of Yunnan Province and even the entire nation towards prosperity and growth.To meet people’s basic cultural needs,increase the effectiveness of the government’s public cultural service,and successfully implement the rural revitalization policy,the study of public cultural service issues in relocation areas is therefore not only a realistic extension of the government’s public management.With case studies,literature research,and field surveys,this paper examines the creation of a community public cultural service system based on urban-style relocation communities for the purpose of reducing poverty.It does so from the perspective of public culture and aims to offer useful resources for the implementation of public cultural services.In order to provide public cultural facilities,goods,and services to the general public,this paper expands the public cultural service-providing institutions with the participation of public welfare cultural units.Corresponding to local public finance as the main input method of cultural services.Although the urban-style relocation communities have improved since their original construction compared to the national poverty eradication,they are still certain issues.There are issues specific to relocated communities,such as the disconnect between the provision of public cultural services and the original culture of relocated communities,the plethora of issues that are common to relocated communities and non-relocated communities alike,such as inadequate financial investment by local governments and a shortage of talent in public cultural services.This paper takes the background of "relocated communities" and the above problems as the starting point to analyze the main reasons for the problems:firstly,not enough attention is paid to the construction of public cultural services,and the proportion of public cultural services in the government’s work is still low,which leads to limited expenditure and insufficient inclination in the corresponding areas.Secondly,there is a lack of public culture exploration of local characteristics in relocation sites and relocation areas,resulting in a mismatch between the institutional mechanisms of public cultural services and relocated urban communities,and secondly,there is a lack of participation of various social forces.First,to pay more attention to the construction of public cultural services and further increase the investment in them;second,to optimize the selection of cultural construction teams based on the relocation context;third,to provide rich public cultural services that are closely integrated with the cultures of relocated and relocated areas;fourth,to provide multiple channels for community residents to express their cultural needs and to keep the channels for expressing their needs open;and fifth,to provide multiple channels for community residents to express their cultural needs.
【Key words】 Type of urban centralized resettlement; Relocation for poverty alleviation; Public cultural services;
- 【网络出版投稿人】 云南大学 【网络出版年期】2026年 05期
- 【分类号】D669.3;G249.27;D630