【作者】 李宁；

【导师】 罗丽英； 潘菁；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 国际商务（专业学位）， 2023， 硕士

【摘要】 当前世界各国正如火如荼地发展数字经济与数字贸易,数字服务贸易战略意义不断凸显,因此我国必须跟上数字时代潮流,重视数字服务贸易的发展,在后疫情时代抓住新的发展机遇,推动我国外贸领域实现高质量发展。研究如何促进数字服务贸易的发展,首先要分析其影响因素。在诸多生产要素中,知识产权具有显著的无形性,因而能影响无形的数字服务贸易,成为影响数字服务贸易发展的重要因素,本文正是在此背景下展开相关研究。本文首先阐述了知识产权协议对数字服务贸易的理论基础与影响机制,并提出两个假设:知识产权协议有助于促进缔约国数字服务贸易出口,此时市场扩张效应占主导地位;知识产权协议会限制缔约国数字服务贸易出口,此时市场支配效应占主导地位。文章描述了区域贸易协定下知识产权协议的发展现状,分析了数字服务贸易出口发展的现状,并运用各种图表,具体分析了数字服务贸易的规模、地区结构、发达国家与发展中国家规模和细分产业结构的具体情况。文章收集了2005年-2021年数字服务贸易出口的面板数据,采用多期双重差分法,估计了知识产权协议对数字服务贸易出口的影响。研究结果表明:知识产权协议对数字服务贸易出口有显著正向影响,知识产权协议显著提高了各国数字服务贸易出口额。然而,知识产权协议对发达国家和发展中国家的影响相同吗?知识产权协议对每个细分产业的影响均相同吗?为了回答这两个问题,作者从不同发展水平经济体角度和细分产业角度展开异质性分析,进一步探讨知识产权协议对数字服务贸易出口的影响。研究发现:(1)相对于发达国家,知识产权协议的签订更有利于促进发展中国家数字服务贸易的出口。(2)对于不同细分产业,知识产权协议的政策效果存在显著的差异,签订知识产权协议对知识产权使用费相关产业出口的影响最大,然后依次是个人、文化和娱乐服务,金融服务,电信、计算机和信息服务,其他商务服务,保险与养老金服务出口的市场扩张效应最小。最后,本文根据多期DID实证结果,从政府、行业、企业三个层面提出了知识产权与数字服务贸易发展的相关政策建议。政府不仅要加快发展数字经济和数字贸易,还应积极参与国际数字贸易及知识产权规则的制定。各产业可联合进行自主研发,共同发展数字服务贸易。企业可以加大投入,培育复合型高层次人才;完善自身的知识产权保护机制;服务贸易企业应积极向数字化转型。我国数字服务贸易有望冲破阻碍,向着国内与国外双循环互动的创新发展格局,实现更好地发展。更多还原

【Abstract】 At present,all countries in the world are in full swing to develop digital economy and digital trade,and the strategic significance of digital service trade has become increasingly prominent,which has become a hot field in international competition and cooperation.Therefore,China must keep up with the trend of the digital era,attach importance to the development of digital service trade,seize new development opportunities in the post-epidemic era,and promote the high-quality development of China’s foreign trade field.To study how to promote the development of digital service trade,we must first analyze its influencing factors.Among many factors of production,intellectual property rights have significant intangibility,so they can affect intangible digital service trade and become an important factor affecting the development of digital service trade.This paper first expounds the theoretical basis and impact mechanism of intellectual property agreements on digital service trade from two perspectives,and puts forward two hypotheses: intellectual property agreements help promote the export of digital service trade of contracting countries,when the market expansion effect dominates;Intellectual property rights agreements restrict the export of digital services trade by contracting states,where market dominance prevails.This paper describes the development status of intellectual property agreements under regional trade agreements,analyzes the current situation of export development of digital service trade,and uses various charts to specifically analyze the scale,regional structure,scale and sub-industrial structure of developed and developing countries.This paper collects panel data on digital service trade exports from 2005 to 2021,and uses the multi-period double difference method to estimate the impact of intellectual property agreements on digital service trade exports.The results show that the intellectual property agreement has a significant positive impact on the export of digital service trade,and the intellectual property agreement significantly increases the export value of digital service trade of various countries.However,do IP agreements affect developed and developing countries equally? Do IP agreements have the same impact on every industry segment? In order to answer these two questions,the authors conduct a heterogeneity analysis from the perspective of economies at different levels of development and industry segments,and further explore the impact of intellectual property agreements on the export of digital services trade.The study finds that:(1)Compared with developed countries,the signing of intellectual property agreements is more conducive to promoting the export of digital services trade in developing countries.(2)For different subdivided industries,there are significant differences in the policy effects of intellectual property agreements,and the signing of intellectual property agreements has the greatest impact on the export of intellectual property royalty-related industries,followed by the market expansion effect of exports of personal,cultural and entertainment services,financial services,telecommunications,computer and information services,other business services,insurance and pension services.Finally,based on the empirical results of multiple DID issues,this paper puts forward relevant policy suggestions on intellectual property and digital service trade development from the government,industry and enterprise levels.The government should not only accelerate the development of the digital economy and digital trade,but also actively participate in the formulation of international digital trade and intellectual property rules.All industries can jointly carry out independent research and development and jointly develop digital service trade.Enterprises can increase investment and cultivate compound high-level talents;Improve its own intellectual property protection mechanism;Service trade enterprises should actively move towards digital transformation.Through these more inclusive and scientific measures,China’s digital service trade will break through obstacles,move towards an innovative development pattern of domestic and foreign dual circulation interaction,and achieve better development.更多还原