【作者】 王磊；

【导师】 曹炜；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 中国语言文学， 2023， 硕士

【摘要】 惠棟是清代經學研究的“漢學大宗”,乾嘉學派之吳派的代表性人物。他畢生致力於經學研究,邃於易學,專宗漢學,是乾嘉考據學的奠基人,在學術史上有著極高的地位。《易漢學》是清代第一部研究《易》的專著。它是一部進行漢易整理的輯佚類著作,旨在梳理漢代經師説易的源流,掇拾易家遺著,並期恢復漢易之原貌。該書是惠棟研究漢易象數和卦氣説的重要著作,涉及大量對卦辭的解釋和説明,也是現今研究漢易的重要参考。惠棟《易漢學》對於研究清代乾嘉時期易學具有重要學術價值。目前學術界對於《易漢學》的研究主要集中在經學方面,但在訓詁學方面研究較少。故本論文從訓詁學角度出發,對《易漢學》開展詳細研究,梳理並分析該書的訓詁內容、訓詁方法和訓詁評議,進而歸納總結出《易漢學》的訓詁特點與不足,以期對惠棟訓詁內涵、乾嘉吳派訓詁全貌、清代語言文學進一步研究有所裨益。本論文共分爲以下四個章節:第一章爲緒論部分,主要介绍了惠棟的生平以及《易漢學》的內容與版本情況,分析梳理了惠棟《易漢學》的研究現狀,最後説明本論文的研究緣起和研究意義。第二章詳細論述惠棟《易漢學》的訓詁內容,主要從考釋詞句(解釋字詞、分析句讀和串講文意)、考辨字音(直音法、反切法和讀若法)、校勘文字(校誤字和校衍字)、考證異文、考證(名物、歷史人數和禮儀風俗)五個方面進行分析研究。第三章詳細歸納惠棟《易漢學》的訓詁方法,主要從因聲求義(音同爲訓和音近爲訓)、直陳詞義(同義相訓和設立界説)、據形索義(探義辨字、校形似訛誤和辨明異體字)三個方面進行分析研究。第四章爲惠棟《易漢學》的訓詁評議,客觀總結其訓詁特點與不足。其中,訓詁特點主要包括:旁徵博引,材料詳實;辨析駁正,附以己見;群經互通,探明經義;貫通師法,純正家法。而不足之處主要包括:徵引不確;考釋不當。結語部分對全文進行總結,歸納惠棟《易漢學》的訓詁內容與方法,強調惠棟訓詁特點與不足,以期得到學術界對惠棟及其訓詁學的關註,進一步認識惠棟的學術成就和貢獻。更多还原

【Abstract】 Hui Dong was a "major scholar of Sinology" in the study of Chinese classics in the Qing Dynasty and a representative figure of the Wu School of Qianjia School.He was fully engaged in the study of classics,and concentrated on Sinology.He was the founder of the scholarism of Emperor Qianjia and gained a high status in the academic history.YiHanXue is the first monograph on Yi in the Qing Dynasty.It is a compilation of lost works of the Yi family of the Han Dynasty.It aims to sort out the origin and flow of Yi family said by scholars of the Han Dynasty,collect the legacy of Yi family and restore the original appearance of the Yi family of the Han Dynasty.This book is an important work of Hui Dong’s study on the number of images and Gua Ci theory of Han Yi,involving a large number of interpretations and explanations of the hexagrams,and is also an important reference for the study of Han Yi today.Hui Dong’s YiHanXue is of great academic value for studies of the Book of Changes in the Qianjia period of Qing Dynasty.At present,the academic research on YiHanXue mainly focuses on classics,but there are few studies on exegetical studies.Therefore,from the perspective of exegetical studies,this paper makes a detailed study of the exegetical contents,exegetical methods and exegetical comments of YiHanXue,and then summarizes the exegetical features and deficiencies of YiHanXue,in order to be helpful to the further study of the exegetical connotation of Hui Dong,the exegetical appearance of Qianjia and Wu schools,and the language and literature of Qing Dynasty.This paper is divided into the following four chapters.The first chapter is the introduction,which mainly introduces the life of Hui Dong and the content and version of YiHanXue,analyzes and sorts out the research status quo of Hui Dong’s YiHanXue,and finally explains the origin and significance of the research of this paper.The second chapter discusses the exegetical content of Hui Dong’s YiHanXue in detail,mainly from five aspects:examining the words and sentences(interpreting the words,analyzing the sentence reading and repeating the meaning of the text),examining the words and sounds(direct pronunciation,anti-cutting and reading if),correcting the text(correcting the wrong characters and correcting the derivative characters),textual research,textual research(names,historical numbers and etiquette and customs).The third chapter summarizes the exegetical methods of Hui Dong’s YiHanXue in detail,mainly from the three aspects:seeking meaning from sound(the same sound and the close sound),explaining word meaning directly(the same meaning and the definition is set up),and seeking meaning according to form(identifying the meaning of the character,correcting form similarity and error and identifying the different characters).The fourth chapter is an exegetical review of Hui Dong’s YiHanXue and an objective summary of its exegetical characteristics and deficiencies.Among them,the exegetical features mainly include:extensive references,detailed materials,discrimination and refutation,with opinions,group classics interworking,proving the meaning of the classics,respect the ancient Han Dynasty;and the deficiency mainly includes:the micro quote is not accurate,argumentation is not precise.The conclusion summarizes the whole text,summarizes the exegetical contents and methods of YiHanXue,emphasizes the exegetical features and deficiencies of Hui Dong,in order to get the academic attention of Hui Dong and its exegetical studies,and further understand Hui Dong’s academic achievements and contributions.更多还原