【作者】 张敏；

【导师】 任群；

【作者基本信息】 安徽师范大学 ， 中国语言文学， 2023， 硕士

【摘要】 《诗义会通》是吴闿生的《诗经》学著作。目前学界针对《诗义会通》一书的研究大致包含三个角度:一、延续“五四”风气,挖掘《诗义会通》中的文学阐释。二、联系社会思潮,关注书中对桐城派家法的使用。三、剖析和提炼书中的《诗》学观点,诸如对《诗序》、《韩诗》、“六笙诗”等问题的看法。总之,学界对该书的研究取得了一定的成果,但仍有颇多待研究之处。本文拟解决以下问题:提炼吴闿生治经方法,通过比对发现其思想在理论和实践上的独到之处;考证书中“旧评”的来源及《诗经》评点发展等相关问题”;立足于前人对《诗义会通》评价的争议,回归文本重新定位,并挖掘其对当今《诗经》研究在方法上的借鉴意义。第一章首先从政治、经济、思想三个方面对《诗义会通》成书的社会背景作简单介绍,发现当时革命派和保守派对经学尤其是《诗经》学的不同态度,了解《诗义会通》在当时的定位。接着对比《诗义会通》与桐城派《诗经》学著作,发现《诗义会通》在评点、诗旨、训诂等多方面都吸收了前辈的观点。再从其父亲、老师、自身三个角度寻找吴闿生治经的原因。第二章、第三章均以“会通”为线索,前者首先从外部观察吴闿生本人经学系统中的共性,即追求微言奥旨,其“法气意”的寻求路径既是桐城派由“法”到“义”在理论上的完善,又是其在经学作品中的具体实践;后者从《诗义会通》内部探究书中之会通。其一,考辨书中“旧评”的多重来源,观照“旧评”与再评、新评构成的评点系统及其中体现出的重阳刚、雄奇、顿挫的审美意蕴;其二,发现书中文学阐释、经学阐释并存的现象,该现象受曾国藩、吴汝纶“文道并存”观念的影响,吴闿生进一步将其发展为“文道并重”的观念,并作用于《诗经》的解读之中。最后,考索自《诗义会通》成书以来,不同时期的学者对该书的评价。在与当时一味否《序》的陈独秀等人的对比中,展现吴闿生的独立思考;在与采用西方民俗学等方法解《诗》的王国维等人的对比中,发现其传统思想。在整个《诗经》学的历史长河中,闿生博取多家的兼容心态、立足文本的独立思索、文道并重的阐释方法,均给此后的《诗经》学研究带来一定的启示。更多还原

【Abstract】 Shi Yi Hui Tong is Wu Kaisheng’s book on The Book of Songs.At present,the academic research on the book "Shi Yi Hui Tong" roughly includes three angles: First,to continue the May 4th movement and explore the literary interpretation in "Shi Yi Hui Tong".Second,contact the social trend of thought and pay attention to the use of Tongcheng school’s family law in the book.Third,analyze and refine the views on the study of Poetry in the book,such as the views on the preface to poetry,Han poetry and Liu Sheng poetry.In a word,the academic circles have made some achievements in the study of this book,but there is still much to be studied.This paper intends to solve the following problems:(1)refining Wu Kaisheng’s thought of studying classics,and discovering the uniqueness of his thought in theory and practice through comparison;Textual research on the source of "old comments" in the book and the development of comments on the Book of Songs ";Based on the controversy of predecessors’ evaluation of Shi Yi Hui Tong,this paper returns to the repositioning of the text and explores its reference significance to the study of the Book of Songs today.The first chapter briefly introduces the social background of the book "Shiyi Huitong" from political,economic and ideological aspects,and finds out the different attitudes of revolutionaries and conservatives towards the study of Confucian classics and the study of the Book of Songs at that time,and understands the position of Shiyi Huitong at that time.The second and third chapters all take "communication" as the clue.The former first observes the commonness of Wu Kaisheng’s own Confucian classics system from the outside and pursues the subtle meaning.On the one hand,the path of seeking "law,spirit and meaning" is the theoretical perfection of Tongcheng School from "law" to "righteousness" and its concrete practice in Confucian classics works;Then,comparing the study of Shiyi Huitong with the study of the Book of Songs of Tongcheng School,we can find the circulation phenomenon within Tongcheng School,and Shiyi Huitong absorbed the views of predecessors in many aspects,such as comments,poetic purport,exegesis and so on.The latter explores the book’s comment system from the inside.Firstly,the multiple sources of "old comments" in the book are examined,and the comment system composed of re-evaluation and new comments and the aesthetic implication of masculinity,strangeness and frustration reflected in it are observed;Secondly,it is found that the coexistence of literature and Confucian classics in the book is directly influenced by Zeng Guofan and Wu Rulun’concept of "coexistence of literature and Taoism",and Wu Kaisheng further developed it into the concept of "paying equal attention to literature and Taoism".Finally,the evaluation of the book by scholars in different periods since the book was written by Kao Suo shows independent thinking compared with Chen Duxiu and others who blindly rejected the preface at that time.Compared with Wang Guowei and others who used western folklore to interpret the poem,we found its tradition;In the long history of the study of The Book of Songs,its inclusive mentality,independent thinking based on the text and the interpretation method of paying equal attention to literature and Taoism have all brought some enlightenment to the future study of The Book of Songs.更多还原