【作者】 于涛；

【导师】 马德浩；

【作者基本信息】 华东师范大学 ， 体育硕士（专业学位）， 2023， 硕士

【摘要】 2020年,中共中央办公厅、国务院印发了《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》和《关于全面加强和改进新时代学校体育工作的意见》两份文件,为学校体育评价工作提出了针对性建议,对中考体育改革的深化发展产生了促进作用。对此,许多地区颁布了各种中考体育改革方案与政策。在观察各省市中考体育政策中发现,增加过程性考核或提高过程性考核分值为改革的趋势之一,但当前各省市过程性考核方案设置未形成较为系统的评价体系。因此,本文采用文献资料法、数理统计法、对比分析法、德尔菲法、层次分析法等研究方法梳理了当前我国中考体育过程性考核开展现状并且构建了中考体育过程性考核指标体系,旨在提高中考体育过程性考核的科学性与公平性,从而为培养全面发展的人才打下基础。本研究通过德尔菲法构建了中考体育过程性考核指标体系,并使用层次分析法对各指标的综合权重进行了确定。基于此,得出以下研究结论:1.基于课程标准构建中考体育过程性考核指标体系具有必要性。以课程标准为依据和导向构建评价考核指标体系有利于发挥体育与健康课程的应有价值。本研究结合课程标准与过程性考核开展现状并采用德尔菲法,最终构建了中考体育过程性考核指标体系,包含3个一级指标,8个二级指标和25个三级指标。各地区教育行政部门制定过程性考核方案时,要以课程标准为依据,结合各地区实际情况,制定全面化、多样化的过程性考核指标体系,提高过程性考核的应用效益;2.中考体育过程性考核指标体系中健康相关素养占据较高权重。在本研究最终得出的指标权重情况中,与学生健康素养相关或能够反映学生体质健康水平的指标权重较高,因此中考体育过程性考核应构建以学生健康素养为重点,同时兼顾发展体育与健康课程核心素养中的其他内容的指标体系,以评促教,促进学生全面协调发展;3.各指标的实施可行性与操作性影响指标所占权重。在过程性考核指标中,难以量化、操作性较低的指标往往占据较低的权重。因此需加强对各指标所应用的评价方式与手段的研究,针对难以评价的考核指标研制更具操作性和准确性的评价工具,降低外部因素对于指标体系合理性的影响,从而提高中考体育过程性考核的实际效益。更多还原

【Abstract】 In 2020,the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and The State Council issued two documents,"The Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Educational Evaluation in the New Era" and "Opinions on Comprehensively Strengthening and Improving School Physical Education in the New Era",which put forward targeted suggestions for the school physical education evaluation work and promoted the deepening and development of the reform of physical education in the high school entrance examination.In this regard,many areas have promulgated various sports reform programs and policies.It is found that increasing the process assessment or increasing the process assessment score is one of the trends of reform in observing the sports policies of various provinces and cities in the high school entrance examination.However,there is no systematic evaluation system for the current process assessment scheme setting in various provinces and cities.Therefore,this paper uses literature method,mathematical statistics method,comparative analysis method,Delphi method,analytic hierarchy process method and other research methods to review the current situation of the process assessment of physical education in the high school entrance examination,and constructs the process assessment index system of physical education in the high school entrance examination,in order to improve the scientific and fair process assessment of physical education in the high school entrance examination,so as to lay a foundation for training well-developed talents.In this study,the process assessment index system of high school entrance examination is constructed by Delphi method,and the comprehensive weight of each index is determined by AHP.Based on this,the following research conclusions are drawn:1.It is necessary to construct the physical education process assessment index system based on curriculum standards.Based on and guided by curriculum standards,the evaluation index system is conducive to exerting the due value of physical education and health curriculum.Based on the curriculum standards and the current situation of process assessment and the Delphi method,this study finally constructed the process assessment index system of high school physical education examination,including 3 first-level indicators,8 second-level indicators and 25 third-level indicators.When formulating the process assessment program,the educational administrative department of each region should,based on the curriculum standards and combined with the actual situation of each region,formulate a comprehensive and diversified process assessment index system to improve the application benefits of process assessment.2.In the physical education process assessment index system,health-related literacy occupies a higher weight.In the final weight of indicators obtained in this study,the weight of indicators related to students’ health literacy or able to reflect students’ physical health level is higher.Therefore,the physical education process assessment should construct an index system focusing on students’ health literacy and taking into account the development of other contents in the core literacy of physical education and health curriculum,so as to promote the comprehensive and coordinated development of students.3.The implementation feasibility and operability of each index affect the weight of the index.In the process assessment index,the index that is difficult to quantify and low in operation often occupies the lower weight.Therefore,it is necessary to strengthen the research on the evaluation methods and means applied to each index,and develop more operational and accurate evaluation tools for the evaluation indicators that are difficult to evaluate,so as to reduce the influence of external factors on the rationality of the index system,so as to improve the actual benefits of the physical examination process of high school entrance examination.更多还原