【作者】 李群；

【导师】 刘文；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律（非法学）（专业学位）， 2023， 硕士

【摘要】 认罪认罚从宽制度现已成为我国刑事诉讼程序中不容忽视的重要内容。然而,在司法实务中,由于控辩双方地位的不对等,使得“协商”、“合意”的制度理念在一些认罪认罚案件中被异化为对职权主义的妥协,进而导致被追诉人认罪认罚后反悔的现象时有发生。但对于被追诉人反悔权的相关内容和程序保障,目前还未有法律法规作出详细规定。因此,本文旨在以安徽省作为样本省地,通过检索相关案件、数据,根据被追诉人反悔的两种表现样态、三个时间节点,归纳分析被追诉人行使反悔权的现状并总结其中凸显的问题。同时,考察域外发展较为成熟国家和地区相似制度中有关被追诉人反悔权的规定,以期为完善我国认罪认罚从宽制度中被追诉人反悔权提供参考。最后落脚到我国认罪认罚从宽制度中被追诉人反悔权的制度构建,相应地从完善被追诉人行使反悔权的配套机制、降低被追诉人行使反悔权的司法风险以及避免被追诉人滥用反悔权三个方面提出建议,搭建符合我国国情、科学合理的被追诉人反悔机制。进一步补全被追诉人的正当诉讼权益,指导司法机关公正、合理地应对因被追诉人反悔而产生的诉讼程序变更,促进认罪认罚从宽制度的积极功能得到更好发挥。更多还原

【Abstract】 The plea leniency system has become an important element of China’s criminal procedure.However,in judicial practice,due to the unequal status of the prosecution and the defense,the concepts of "consultation" and "consent" have been alienated into a compromise of authority in some plea cases,which lead to the phenomenon that the pursued person pleads guilty and then repents.The phenomenon of remorse after pleading guilty and punishment has occurred from time to time.However,there are no detailed regulations on the content and procedural protection of the right to remorse of the pursued person.Therefore,this paper,which focuses on Auhui Province,searches relevant cases and data,and summarizes and analyzes the current situation of the right to repentance and the problems highlighted by the right to repentance according to two types of actions and three possible occurrences of the repentance of the pursued person.At the same time,the provisions of the right to repentance in similar systems of certain countries and regions are examined,with a view to providing reference for improving the right to repentance in China’s plea system.Finally,suggestions in three aspects are put forward to build a scientific and reasonable mechanism of remorse of the pursued person in line with China’s national conditions,accordingly,from the perfection of the supporting mechanism of the right of remorse of the pursued person,reducing the judicial risk of the right of remorse of the pursued person and avoiding the abuse of the right of remorse of the pursued person.It further complements the rightful litigation rights and interests of the pursued person,guides the judiciary to respond to the changes in litigation procedures arising from the pursued person’s remorse in a fair and reasonable manner,and promotes the positive function of the plea leniency system to be better played.更多还原