节点文献

更新背景下老旧小区改造模式对比研判

Contrastive Study and Judgment on the Reconstruction Mode of the Old Community under the Background of Renewal

【作者】 王勤;

【导师】 张若曦;

【作者基本信息】 厦门大学 , 城市与区域规划, 2021, 硕士

【副题名】以厦门市H片区为例

【摘要】 改革开放以来,我国城市建设大量的集合住宅小区,这些小区因建成时间较长,建筑与设施存在老化问题,难以适应当前居住需求。作为城市人口的主要居住单元,老旧小区的更新发展将关系着城市的社会、民生与经济等问题。因此,城市老旧小区的更新改造,是新形势下城市更新发展所面临的较为迫切的问题。本文首先对国内外城市更新与居住区更新的研究进行总结回顾,分析上海市与深圳市老旧小区更新的实践案例。其次以厦门市H片区的老旧小区更新实践为实证研究,通过对其曾经探索的自主更新模式、与当前顺利进行中的大规模成片拆除改造模式进行深入探讨,并结合居民调研访谈结果,发现当前这一看似成功的大规模拆除改造模式中,政府投入较大,但居民的满意度评价与获得感较低;而自主更新的实践探索虽然失败,但居民认为该更新模式的获得感与幸福感较高,且其中的困境与经验也值得思考和借鉴。因此在这一基础上,为探索投入与效益成正比、可持续可复制推广的老旧小区更新改造模式,本文第六章从改造成本、改造结果、改造可持续性及改造参与主体的角度,对老旧小区自主更新模式与大规模成片改造模式进行深入对比研判。因为老旧小区更新的核心目的,是为改善居民生活并提升幸福感,在此背景下,政府的投入才能获得更好的效应。因此本文尝试从政府投入与居民获得的角度,对自主更新和成片改造两种模式进行对比,基于改造获得更高的综合效益出发,对城市老旧小区更新改造模式提出优化建议。综合文章的分析结果,最终得出本文研究结论:建议城市老旧小区更新以政府统一规划引导下的自主更新改造模式为主,通过优化制度来完善和推进自主更新,并带动社区、政府和市场共同协助参与到老旧小区的更新中来。

【Abstract】 After the reform and opening up,a large number of residential areas have been built in Chinese cities.These residential areas are difficult to meet the current living needs due to the long time spent in construction and the aging of buildings and facilities.As the main residential unit of the urban population,the renewal and development of the old residential district will be related to the social,people’s livelihood and economic issues of the city.Therefore,the renewal and transformation of the old residential areas in the city is an urgent problem faced by the urban renewal and development under the new situation.Firstly,this paper reviews the domestic and foreign research on urban renewal and residential renewal,and analyzes the practical cases of the renewal of old residential areas in Shanghai and Shenzhen.Second to update old district of xiamen city H area practice for empirical research,based on its once explored the independent updating model,and the current go smoothly in the large-scale piece removed then explores its reform mode,and connecting with the residents survey and interviews,found that the current this seemingly successful large-scale demolition reconstruction mode,government spending is bigger,but residents satisfaction evaluation and obtain lower;Although the practice and exploration of self-renewal failed,residents believed that the renewal mode had a high sense of gain and happiness,and the difficulties and experience in it were also worth thinking about and referring to.So on the basis of this,to explore investment is proportional to the efficiency,and sustainable replicable promotion mode of old village renovation,this article from the results of revamping cost,chapter 6,sustainability and participate in the main body’s point of view,reform the old village autonomy update mode and large-scale renovation of an in-depth comparative study.Because the core purpose of the renewal of the old community is to improve residents’ lives and enhance their sense of happiness after the transformation,only in this context can the government’s investment achieve better effects.Therefore,from the perspective of government investment and residents’ gain,this paper attempts to compare the two modes of independent renewal and piecewall reconstruction.Based on the higher comprehensive benefits of reconstruction,optimization suggestions are put forward for the renewal and reconstruction mode of old urban communities.Based on the analysis results of this paper,the conclusion of this paper is finally drawn:it is suggested that the renewal of old urban communities should be based on the independent renewal mode guided by the unified planning of the government,and the autonomous renewal should be improved and promoted through the optimization of the system,and the community,the government and the market should be driven to jointly assist in the renewal of old residential areas.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 厦门大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2024年 08期
  • 【分类号】TU984.12
节点文献中: