【作者】 王宁；

【导师】 阎铁毅；

【作者基本信息】 大连海事大学 ， 法律（法学）（专业学位）， 2022， 硕士

【摘要】 行政诉讼原告资格的判定面临着判定利害关系概念的模糊以及判定标准不确定的现实司法困境,基于法律需要客观、确定的需求,我国引入保护规范理论旨在为利害关系标准提供客观、精细的判定标准。保护规范理论是域外理论,其与主观公权利和反射利益的概念相伴相生。保护规范首先作为主观公权利的三大概念因素之一由德国学者布勒总结归纳得来;随着强制性规范和法律权能在主观公权利判定因素的权重逐渐的削弱,保护规范被提取为保护规范基准;保护规范基准不断发展形成旧保护规范理论,旧保护理论也随着德国行政法学的发展逐步演变为新保护规范理论。中国式保护规范理论重新界定了保护规范理论的内涵与外延,为行政诉讼原告资格的判定带来了新的路径。本文从可操作性、涵盖性和与我国行政审判相适配性三个方面对中国式保护规范理论进行合理性分析。中国式保护规范理论的适用对我国行政审判具有积极意义:提供了客观、确定的判定标准、与合法性审查原则相契合、实现保障诉权和防堵滥诉之间的平衡。学界中对保护规范理论的运用提出了解释基准开放性和我国基本权利无放射效力的质疑,保护规范理论的适用在司法实践中存在机械适用的问题,我国法治现状也尚不足以支撑保护规范理论完全发挥其全部功能,本文分析上述两个问题产生的原因并提出相应的对策建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 The judgment of plaintiff’s qualification in administrative litigation is facing the realistic Judicial Dilemma of the fuzzy concept of judgment interest and the uncertain judgment standard.Based on the objective and definite needs of legal needs,China introduces the theory of protection norms in order to provide objective and fine judgment standards for the interest standard.The theory of protective norms is an extraterritorial theory,which is accompanied by the concepts of subjective public rights and reflective interests.Firstly,as one of the three conceptual factors of subjective public rights,protection norms are summarized by German scholar Buhler;With the weakening of mandatory norms and legal power in the weight of subjective public rights,protective norms are extracted as the benchmark of protective norms;With the development of German administrative law,the old protection theory has gradually evolved into a new protection norm theory.The Chinese theory of protection norms redefines the connotation and extension of the theory.This paper analyzes the rationality of the Chinese theory of protection norms from three aspects: operability,coverage and adaptability to China’s administrative trial.The application of the Chinese theory of protection norms is of positive significance to China’s administrative trial,provides an objective and definite judgment standard,and is consistent with the principle of legitimacy review To achieve a balance between safeguarding the right of action and preventing blocking and abusing litigation.The academic circles have questioned the openness of the interpretation benchmark and the basic non radiation effect of China on the application of the protection norm theory.There are problems of mechanical application in the judicial practice of the application of the protection norm theory,and the current situation of the rule of law in China is not enough to support the protection norm theory to fully play its function.This paper analyzes the causes of the above two problems and puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions.更多还原