【作者】 张奕；

【导师】 周沐君；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 社会学， 2022， 硕士

【摘要】 本文按照一种逻辑系统地阐述了贝克的风险社会理论。贝克的理论以自反性现代性和风险为起点,通过各个领域的后果与政治相关联。笔者详细讨论了理论中的一些关键概念以及它们之间的关系。笔者指出,贝克的论述在现代性发展的背景下是具有价值的。它提供了一种理解社会团结的路径,同时注意到了现代社会中科学知识与决策和权力的关系以及由此而来的政治领域的泛化。然而,因为过度关注风险和安全问题,贝克在理论中使用了各种简单的二元划分——工业社会/风险社会;科学理性/社会理性;有权力主体/无权力主体。这些对立划分一方面夸大了现实世界中的问题,另一方面简化了现实世界中多样的群体和模糊的边界。这使得贝克的理论和解决方案难以处理现实世界中的许多重要的新现象。笔者详细讨论了这些二分的局限性,并试图提供一些可能拓展贝克理论的思路和实践。更多还原

【Abstract】 This article follows a logical system to elaborate Beck’s theory of risk society.Taking reflexive modernity and risk as a starting point,Baker’s theory is related to politics through the consequences of each domain.The author discusses in detail some of the key concepts in the theory and the relationships between them.The author points out that Beck’s account is valuable in the context of the development of modernity.It provides a path to understanding social solidarity while noting the relationship of scientific knowledge to decision-making and power in modern societies and the resulting generalization of the political sphere.However,because of the excessive focus on risk and security issues,Beck uses various simple binary divisions in his theory-industrial society/risk society;scientific rationality/social rationality;and subjects with power/subjects without power.These dichotomous divisions exaggerate the problems in the real world,and simplify the diverse groups and blurred boundaries in the real world.This makes it difficult for Beck’s theories to deal with many important new phenomena in the real world.The author discusses the limitations of these dichotomies in detail and tries to provide some ideas and practices that might expand Beck’s theory.更多还原