【作者】 杨薇；

【导师】 宁立成；

【作者基本信息】 南昌大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2022， 硕士

【摘要】 行政协议在我国行政管理活动中很受重视。作为一种柔性的行政手段其兼具行政性与契约性两种属性。基于这两种特殊属性的作用下赋予了行政机关在行政协议履行过程中行使单方变更解除权。行政机关单方变更或解除行政协议不仅打破了公私利益间的均衡状态,同时还存在滥用公权力以及损害公民合法权益的可能,因此我国需要一个强有力的司法审查机制监督与防范行政机关行使单方变更解除权。司法机关需改变仅审查行政行为的合法性,在审查过程中应坚持合法性与合理性相结合的原则从而使得行政协议能够继续履行。司法机关审查思路应从行政机关单方变更解除权的行使条件是否法定、程序性规定是否履行、公共利益的认定是否明确这三个维度出发,具体审查路径应从行政机关单方变更解除权的法律依据和程序上的义务这两个方面展开,由此确保行政机关行使单方变更解除权是否合法与正当。除此之外我国目前在行政机关行使单方变更解除权后对行政相对人的行政赔偿补偿问题上存在不足,在现有的基础上应优化司法机关对行政赔补偿的裁量方式,通过适用民事合同赔补标准、加强对行政赔偿补偿程序的审查以及加大赔偿补偿的力度,由此最大限度的保障行政协议相对人合法权益。另外行政诉讼只是众多解决行政协议单方变更解除纠纷中的途径之一,应综合运用多种救济途径充分发挥调解制度在行政赔偿补偿中的作用,同时引入复议制度,通过行政机关内部自我纠错机制,实现对行政机关权力的规制和对行政协议相对人合法权益的充分保护。更多还原

【Abstract】 Administrative agreement is very important in China’s administrative activities.As a flexible administrative means,it has both administrative and contractual attributes.Based on these two special attributes,the administrative organ is given the right to exercise unilateral change and cancellation in the process of performing the administrative agreement.The unilateral change or cancellation of administrative agreements by administrative organs not only breaks the balance between public and private interests,but also has the possibility of abusing public power and damaging citizens’ legitimate rights and interests.Therefore,China needs a strong judicial review mechanism to supervise and prevent administrative organs from exercising the power of unilateral change and cancellation.Judicial organs need to change the principle of only examining the legitimacy of administrative acts.In the process of examination,they should adhere to the principle of combining legitimacy and rationality,so that the administrative agreement can continue to be performed.The judicial review should start from the three dimensions of whether the exercise conditions of the unilateral change and cancellation right of the administrative organ are legal,whether the procedural provisions are fulfilled,and whether the identification of public interests is clear.The specific review path should start from the two aspects of the legal basis and procedural obligations of the unilateral change and cancellation right of the administrative organ,so as to ensure whether the exercise of the unilateral change and cancellation right of the administrative organ is legal and legitimate.In addition,at present,there are deficiencies in the issue of administrative compensation to the administrative counterpart after the administrative organ exercises the power of unilateral change and cancellation.On the existing basis,we should optimize the discretion of the judicial organ on administrative compensation,and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the counterpart of administrative agreement to the greatest extent by applying the compensation standard of civil contract,strengthening the review of the compensation procedure of administrative compensation and increasing the strength of compensation.In addition,administrative litigation is only one of the many ways to solve the disputes caused by the unilateral change of administrative agreement.We should comprehensively use a variety of relief ways to give full play to the role of mediation system in administrative compensation.At the same time,we should introduce the reconsideration system and realize the regulation of the power of administrative organ and the full protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the counterpart of administrative agreement through the internal self-correction mechanism of administrative organ.更多还原