【作者】 陈强；

【导师】 吴正岚；

【作者基本信息】 南京大学 ， 中国史， 2021， 硕士

【摘要】 邵长蘅(1637-1704),一名衡,字子湘,号青门山人,别号亦窝,毗陵(今江苏常州)人。邵长衡是清代前期布衣文学家的代表人物之一。宋荦认为邵长蘅是可以与侯方域、魏禧二人鼎足而立的大家。汪琬则称邵长蘅之“文章似柳子厚,人品似陆鲁望”。而沈德潜也认为邵长蘅之“古文与侯朝宗、魏叔子称鼎足。诗浏漓顿挫,力追唐人”。也正是因为邵长蘅是清初文坛举足轻重的人物,此前的相关研究自然也是以其文学成就为关注重点,而其它方面则显得相对薄弱。如其生平研究中,不仅存在重大问题遗漏现象,而且还有不少争议之处。康熙十一年(1672)的豫章(南昌)之行,是邵长衡中年的一项重要活动,但学术界长期未曾予以关注。而邵长衡是否参加康熙博学鸿词科考试,则是学界长期争论的问题,主流观点也倾向于肯定。根据邵长蘅《邵子湘全集》、魏禧《魏叔子文集》、陈玉璂《学文堂文集》和施闰章《学余堂集》、秦瀛《己未词科录》以及《白鹿书院志》等史料的记载,可以确认,邵长蘅的南昌之行,是应南康知府廖文英之邀,邵长衡除游览庐山外,还参与了廖文英主持的衡文论学活动;同时也可以认定邵长蘅并未参加康熙博学鸿词科。奏销案被黜、科举无望以及家道中落,对邵长蘅产生了深刻的影响。早期锐意功名的邵长衡,沦为布衣,开始钟情于山水田园之乐,其布衣心态逐步深化。康熙二十三年邵长衡曾获得过一次参加顺天乡试的机会,但最终铩羽而归。此后的邵长衡,虽仍为不能跻身士大夫之列而抱憾,但也最终确立了以布衣终老、以立言求不朽的人生目标。邵长蘅的文学创作对社会黑暗的揭示颇为深刻,此点已为学界公认。但对更能体现其经世致用思想高度和家国情怀的钱谷货币之论,却长期忽视。邵长衡“虽伏处岩穴,犹将任天下之责”。他虽以布衣身份终老,但一直胸怀经世致用之志。邵长蘅关心时事,善于思考,对社会、经济、政治、军事等诸多问题都提出了独特而又深刻的见解,而民生和社会疾苦则是其关注和思考的重点。最能直接反映邵长蘅经济主张的作品,是其《青门簏稿》卷十六中的数篇试策文。这是他以布衣之身关注时政并阐述自己主张的主要方式,即使邵长蘅曾出入于王泽弘和宋荦等地方大员的幕府,但在其记述当时之经历时,多以诗文唱和为主,涉及到社会民生和为政问题的内容很少,因此在作为幕宾时邵长蘅并未过多的参与到具体行政事务的处理中,更多的是一种“文友”关系。在《青门簏稿》卷十六所收录的时务策文十五篇中,与经济民生问题相关的即有五篇,占到了三分之一,可见邵长蘅当时对于钱谷财币问题的关注度之高。本文采用经济史与文学史交叉的视角,系统梳理邵长蘅钱谷财币之论的主要内容、形成背景和理论特色,揭示其钱谷财币之论的学术史和文学史价值,是邵长衡研究必须关注的重点。也只有了解邵氏的钱谷财币之学,才能更进一步地认识邵长蘅的诗文反映现实的深度和力度。其有关“吴俗奢而民实贫”的论述,与前人和同时代的流行观念相比,更为全面而深刻。这一说法的实质是指出了吴地赋重、俗奢和民贫三者相互作用而导致民生的恶性循环。通过邵长蘅《吴趋吟》与《参宪方公寿序》的对读,可以得出以下结论:《吴趋吟》以铺陈描写的方式,形象生动地揭示了《参宪方公寿序》“吴俗奢而民贫”的深刻内涵。因此,《吴趋吟》对社会危机的描写,达到了前所未有的深度。概言之,邵长蘅的经济观念和文学创作相映生辉,彼此成就,反映了清顺康年间布衣文学创新的社会背景和理论动力。总体而言,本文从经济史与文学史交叉的角度来研究邵长蘅的钱谷财币之论,试图由此揭示清初布衣经世之学的独特风貌和布衣文学发展的独特动力。更多还原

【Abstract】 Shao Changheng(1637-1704),a native of Heng,whose name was Zixiang,was named Qingmenshan,and his nickname was Yiwo,who was born in Piling(now Changzhou,Jiangsu).Shao Changheng is one of the representative figures of the commoner writers in the early Qing Dynasty.Song Nao believes that Shao Changheng is a great man who can stand with Hou Fangyu and Wei Xi.Wang Wan said that Shao Changheng’s "article resembles Liu Zihou,and his character resembles Lu Luwang".And Shen Deqian also thinks that Shao Changheng’s "Ancient prose and Hou Chaozong and Wei Shuzi are very famous.The poems are frustrated,and they pursue the Tang Dynasty.”It is precisely because Shao Changheng was a pivotal figure in the literary world of the early Qing Dynasty,the previous related research naturally focused on his literary achievements,while other aspects were relatively weak.For example,in his life research,there are not only major omissions,but also many controversies.The Yuzhang(Nanchang)trip in the eleventh year of Kangxi(1672)was an important activity of Shao Changheng’s middle age,but the academic circles have not paid attention to it for a long time.Whether Shao Changheng participates in the Kangxi erudite ci test is a long-standing issue in academic circles,and mainstream views tend to be affirmative.Based on historical materials such as Shao Changheng’s Complete Works of Shao Zixiang,Wei Xi’s Collected Works of Wei Shuzi,Chen Yuzhang’s Collected Works of Xuewentang,and Shi Runzhang’s Collected Works of Xueyutang,Qin Ying’s Records of Jiwei Ci Kelu,and the Records of Bailu Academy According to the record,it can be confirmed that Shao Changheng’s trip to Nanchang was at the invitation of the prefect of Nankang Liao Wenying.In addition to visiting Lushan,Shao Changheng also participated in the Hengwen theory activities hosted by Liao Wenying;at the same time,it can be determined that Shao Changheng did not participate in the Kangxi erudition.Hong Ci Section.The dismissal of the memorial case,the hopelessness of the imperial examination,and the fall of the family have had a profound impact on Shao Changheng.In the early days,Shao Changheng,who was determined to fame and fame,became a commoner and began to fall in love with the joy of landscape and pastoralism,and his commoner mentality gradually deepened.In the 23rd year of Kangxi,Shao Changheng was given a chance to participate in the Shuntian Township Examination,but he eventually returned home unfailingly.After that,although Shao Changheng still regretted not being able to be among the scholar-officials,he finally established the life goal of enduring old age with commoner clothes and seeking immortality with standing words.Shao Changheng’s literary creation reveals the darkness of society quite profoundly,and this point has been recognized by the academic circles.However,the theory of Qiangu currency,which can better embody his high level of practical thinking and family and country sentiments,has been ignored for a long time.Shao Changheng"Although he lies in a cave,he will still be the responsibility of the world.”Although he died as a commoner,he always had the ambition to be practical.Shao Changheng cares about current affairs and is good at thinking.He has put forward unique and profound insights into many issues such as society,economy,politics,and military.People’s livelihood and social suffering are the focus of his attention and thinking.The works that most directly reflect Shao Changheng’s economic propositions are the several trial essays in volume sixteen of his "Drafts of Qingmen".This is the main way he pays attention to current affairs and expounds his own ideas as a commoner.Even though Shao Changheng had been in and out of the shogunate of local officials such as Wang Zehong and Song Nao,when he described his experience at that time,he mostly focused on singing and singing.There is very little content related to social,people’s livelihood and political issues,so when Shao Changheng was not too involved in the handling of specific administrative affairs as a guest,he was more of a kind of"literary friends" relationship.Among the fifteen articles on current affairs and policies included in Volume 16 of the "Drafts of Qingmen",there are five articles related to economic and people’s livelihood issues,accounting for one-third,which shows that Shao Changheng paid attention to the issue of money and money at that time.High.This article adopts the perspective of the intersection of economic history and literary history,systematically combs the main content,formation background and theoretical characteristics of Shao Changheng’s Qiangu Finance Theory and reveals the academic and literary history value of his Qiangu Finance Theory.This is what Shao Changheng must pay attention to in his research.Focus.Only by understanding Shao’s theory of money and money can we further understand the depth and strength of Shao Changheng’s poems reflecting reality.His exposition on "Wu popular is extravagant but people are really poor" is more comprehensive and profound than the popular ideas of predecessors and contemporaries.The essence of this statement is to point out the vicious circle of people’s livelihood caused by the interaction of Wu’s riches,vulgar luxury and the poor.By reading Shao Changheng’s "Wu Shiyin" and "Preface to the Constitutional Party’s Public Life",the following conclusions can be drawn:"Wu Shiyin" vividly reveals the "Preface to the Constitutional Party’s Public Life" in an expansive and descriptive way.The profound connotation of "the vulgar and the poor".Therefore,the description of the social crisis in "Wu Xiyin" has reached an unprecedented depth.In a nutshell,Shao Changheng’s economic concepts and literary creations complement each other and achieve each other,reflecting the social background and theoretical motivation of commoner literary innovation during the Qingshunkang period.In general,this article studies Shao Changheng’s theory of money and money from the perspective of the intersection of economic history and literary history and attempts to reveal the unique style of the study of Commonwealth in the early Qing Dynasty and the unique driving force for the development of Commonwealth literature.更多还原