高中化学教科书“电化学”内容的分析与比较

【作者】 高洁；

【导师】 侯典军；

【作者基本信息】 曲阜师范大学 ， 教育硕士（专业学位）， 2021， 硕士

【副题名】以人教版和鲁科版为例

【摘要】 随着《普通高中化学课程标准(2017年版)》的颁布,不同版本的化学教科书应运而生,对教科书内容进行对比研究是当前化学研究的热点。现有研究大多基于知识经验对教科书内容进行分析,很少从语言词汇出发。该研究从语言词汇出发对教科书内容进行对比分析,以期发现人教、鲁科版高中化学教科书中电化学知识内容呈现的差异。该研究梳理与述评教科书分析比较、教科书分析方法的相关文献研究,厘定研究思路,确定研究框架。然后以电化学知识内容为载体,将化学课程标准的内容要求和教科书具体内容结合,划分电化学知识的三个学习主题,并确定各学习主题下的十六个知识组块。借助库博中文语料库词频统计、搭配词、分布图功能,形成知识组块概念词汇列表、搭配词列表、分布图,结合教科书中的具体内容,分析人教版和鲁科版教科书在内容广度、语言表述、重点内容以及知识贯穿程度上的差异。最后借助库博中文语料库搭配词功能形成知识组块与动词、语气词、图表的搭配列表,与教科书具体内容结合,分析两版本教科书在功能栏目、图表呈现上的差异,以期对教科书进行深层次研究。研究表明:(1)发展学生同一维度的化学核心素养,可以选择和组织不同的知识内容体系。(2)教学重点与教科书重点知识内容存在一定的不一致性。(3)人教版教科书强调科学探究的高阶思维发展价值,鲁科版注重科学探究的多重发展价值。研究的创新点:(1)使用库博中文语料库基于语言词汇对教科书内容进行分析研究工具具有一定创新性,为文本分析提供新方法。(2)得出的人教、鲁科版教科书中电化学知识内容、功能栏目、图表呈现差异的结论,为开展电化学知识的教学提供新依据。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the promulgation of the "General High School Chemistry Curriculum Standards(2017 Edition)",different versions of chemistry textbooks came into being.The comparative study of the content of textbooks is a hot spot in current chemistry research.Existing studies mostly analyze the content of textbooks based on knowledge and experience,and rarely start from language vocabulary.This research conducted a comparative analysis of textbook content from the perspective of language vocabulary,with a view to discovering differences in electrochemistry knowledge content in human education and Luke version of high school chemistry textbooks.The research combs and reviews textbook analysis and comparison,textbook analysis method related literature research,determines research ideas,and determines research framework.Then use electrochemical knowledge content as the carrier,combine the content requirements of the chemistry curriculum standard with the specific content of the textbook,divide the three learning topics of electrochemical knowledge,and determine the sixteen knowledge blocks under each learning topic.With the help of the word frequency statistics,collocation words,and distribution map functions of the Corpro Chinese corpus,the knowledge block concept vocabulary list,collocation word list,and distribution map are formed,combined with the specific content of the textbook,and analyzed in the content breadth of the textbooks of the People’s Education Edition and the Luke Edition.Differences in language expression,key content,and degree of knowledge penetration.Finally,with the help of the collocation function of the Corpro Chinese corpus,a collocation list of knowledge chunks,verbs,modal particles,and diagrams is formed,combined with the specific content of the textbook,and the differences in the presentation of functional columns and diagrams between the two versions of the textbook are analyzed,in order to deepen the textbook.the study.Research shows that:(1)To develop students’ core chemistry literacy in the same dimension,they can choose and organize different knowledge content systems.(2)There is a certain inconsistency between the teaching focus and the key knowledge content of the textbook.(3)The PEP textbook emphasizes the development value of high-level thinking of scientific inquiry,while the Luke edition emphasizes the multiple development value of scientific inquiry.Research innovations:(1)Using the Corpro Chinese Corpus to analyze textbook content based on language vocabulary.Research tools are innovative and provide new methods for text analysis.(2)The conclusions drawn that the electrochemical knowledge content,functional columns,and diagrams in the PEP and Luke textbooks show differences,provide a new basis for the teaching of electrochemical knowledge.更多还原