【作者】 刘阳；

【导师】 李春；

【作者基本信息】 云南大学 ， 法律硕士（非法学）（专业学位）， 2020， 硕士

【摘要】 在刑事司法领域,对于因家庭暴力导致的受虐妇女杀害施暴丈夫的行为,在刑法性质认定与处罚标准上存在着较大争议,这导致法院在处理相关案件时对被告人(即受虐妇女方)处罚结果往往存在较大差异,这样的判决结果显然难为刑法理论界与社会舆论所接受。2015年3月4日,由最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部联合制发的《关于依法办理家庭暴力犯罪案件的意见》为我国保护受虐妇女群体合法利益提供了法律依据,法院在此后对因家暴而导致的受虐妇女杀夫类案件的刑事审判中,亦结合《意见》对受虐妇女群体在量刑时相较过往予以从轻、减轻。然而,在实际司法活动中,许多法院过于重视裁量权的行使,以达到“为了保护而予以保护”的目的,将案件审判过早的进入到量刑环节,却忽视了更为重要的案件事实与定罪量刑规范,其判决结果看似是对受虐妇女群体的“宽大处理”,却往往使其背负“违法犯罪”之污名,伤害到其合法权益,有悖于保护之初衷。笔者通过对受虐妇女杀夫案件的检索分析,试将不同案件中受虐妇女所面临的家暴侵害以程度大小、在案发时是否发生为依据予以分类,从而将受虐妇女杀人行为予以细分,并综合国内诸多学说,立足法益保护原则,从我国刑法条文出发,以行为论、违法论、责任论的阶梯式逻辑分析,为司法实践处理相关案件提供认定路径分析,力图今后对于该类型案件的判决能够达到“同案同判、类案类判”之效果,如此既能充分保障受虐妇女群体合法权益,又能促进裁判公正,维护司法权威。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the field of criminal justice,whether the determination of criminal character and punishment fit the crime has stirred great controversies when referring to battered women who killed husband due to domestic violence.Under the circumstance,when the court dealing with related cases,great distinction of the punishment for the defendant(that is,battered women party)has occurred,and the determination of battered women is clearly unacceptable by criminal law theorists and the public.On March 4,2015,“Opinions on Legally Handling Cases involving Crimes of Domestic Violence” has been issued by the Supreme People’s Court,the Supreme People’s Procuratorate,the Ministry of Public Security,and the Ministry of Justice,which provides legal ground for protecting the legitimate rights and interests of battered women in our country,and in the next criminal trials of domestic violence,according to“Opinions” the court could light or mitigate punishment to battered women who killed husband.However,in the practical experiences of judicial work,many courts emphasized on the exercise of discretion and placed the protection high on the priority,pushed the case in the sentencing procedure too early with neglecting the more important factors that the case facts and the standardization of conviction and sentence.In this case,the verdicts seem to be "lenient treatment " for battered women who killed husband,but actually make them confess the crime and bear the stigma of illegal crime,resulting in hurting their legitimate rights and interests and playing an ineffective role of protection.This paper search and analyze the cases of battered women who killed her batterer,classify the domestic violence faced by battered women in different cases based on the extent of violence and whether happened at the scene of the crime,thus battered women’s behavior of killing husband has been subdivided.Based on the principle of protecting legal interest,integrating many domestic theories,in accordance with the provisions of China’s criminal law and the stepwise logical analysis of behavior theory,illegal crime theory and liability theory,with the aim to provide the determination path analysis for judicial practice in dealing with related cases and make the verdicts as theway of "similar cases be treated similarly".In this way,the judiciary could sufficiently protect the legitimate rights and interests of battered women who kill,and also promote judicial impartiality and authority.更多还原