【作者】 李颖；

【导师】 庞华玲；

【作者基本信息】 北京理工大学 ， 法律（法学）（专业学位）， 2018， 硕士

【摘要】 “快播案”中,控辩双方围绕证据的取证和保管环节进行争论,其实质就是电子数据的鉴真问题。随着科技信息的发展,电子数据出现在诉讼程序中的频率越来越高,鉴真是证据可采性的前提,而我国的电子数据鉴真制度规定的比较少,且鉴真的方法主要集中在笔录方面,因此电子数据的鉴真非常有必要进行研究。首先,本文从“快播案”出发,发现本案的焦点问题是如何认定四台服务器和淫秽视频的真实性,这就涉及到了电子数据的鉴真问题。接着分析了鉴真的含义和性质,对鉴真和鉴定进行了比较。其次,本文分析了我国电子数据鉴真的现状,对现有的电子数据鉴真的法律规范进行了梳理,重点分析了《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部关于办理刑事案件收集提取和审查判断电子数据若干问题的规定》,指出该规定中的积极方面和不足之处,并且从司法案例中分析刑事庭审中反映出的鉴真问题。然后,为了更好的借鉴国外电子数据鉴真制度,本文研究了大陆法系和英美法系主要国家的立法,并重点研究了美国电子数据的鉴真制度,主要分析了自我鉴真和旁证鉴真的方法。最后,本文根据我国鉴真的现状,从我国的国情出发,借鉴国外经验,构建符合我国司法实践的电子数据鉴真制度。该制度的内容包括明确诉讼中的双方当事人为鉴真主体,侦查机关可以作为鉴真的辅助主体;确立了电子数据鉴真的方法,限制了法官的自由裁量权;统一了电子数据的鉴真标准;并建议在庭前程序中增加鉴真环节。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the "QVOD Case",the prosecution and defense debated the evidence collection and custody of the evidence.This essence is the problem of forensic electronic data.With the development of scientific and technological information,the frequency of electronic data appearing in the proceedings is getting higher and higher,and authentication is the precondition of the admissibility of evidence.However,the system of electronic data authentication in our country is relatively few,and the method of truth is mainly focused on the record.Therefore,it is very necessary to study the authenticity of the electronic data.First of all,This article starts from the "QVOD Case".The focus of this case is how to identify the authenticity of four servers and obscene videos,which involves the identification of electronic data.Then it analyzes the meaning and nature of authentication and have a compares authentication with identification.Secondly,this paper analyzes the current situation of electronic data authentication in China,it sorts out the existing legal norms of electronic data authentication.The article focuses on the analysis of the regulations of “The Supreme People’s court,the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the Ministry of public security Provisions on the collection,extraction and examination of electronic data in criminal cases”,it points out the positive aspects and shortcomings of the provisions,and this paper analyses the authentic problems reflected in the trial of the criminal court from the judicial cases.Then,in order to have a better of learning from foreign electronic data authentication system,this paper studies the legislation of the main countries of the continental law system and the Anglo American law system,and focuses on the authentication system of American electronic data,mainly analyzing the methods of self authentication and circumstantial authentication.Finally,based on the current situation of authentication in China,this paper sets out from the national conditions of our country and draws on the experience of foreign countries to construct the electronic data authentication system which is in accordance with our judicial practice.The content of the system includes clearly defining the two parties in litigation as the subject of authenticity,the investigative department can be the auxiliary subject of authentication;Besides that,the system also confirm the method of the electronic data authentication and have a limit to the discretion of the judge;Last but not least,the system unified the authentication standard of the electronic data and add the authentication link in the pre-court procedure is also suggested.更多还原