【作者】 刘强；

【导师】 高巍；

【作者基本信息】 云南大学 ， 法律硕士（专业学位）， 2019， 硕士

【摘要】 在《刑法修正案(八)》颁布前,针对食品、药品监管领域渎职犯罪,两高先后于2001年、2014年出台相关司法解释,其中2001年出台针对制售伪劣商品法律适用的解释,部分涵盖食品、药品生产经营环节的刑法评价;2014年出台的解释直接关注药品安全刑事犯罪的法律适用。除《刑法》及相关司法解释外,行政法领域的《中华人民共和国食品安全法》《中华人民共和国药品管理法》等法律法规,可作为认定食品、药品监管领域渎职犯罪的重要参考。虽然食品、药品安全立法已逐渐形成比较完备的体系。但是在刑事司法实务中,要准确认定食品、药品监管领域渎职犯罪还存在诸多疑难问题和争议问题。例如放纵制售伪劣商品犯罪行为罪的认定,不仅涉及被监管人制售伪劣商品犯罪行为的认定,还涉及“不履行法律规定的追究职责”的认定以及监管主体的实际罪过的认定等,另外,还涉及追诉时效。鉴于以上难题,本文将以放纵制售伪劣商品犯罪行为罪为例,以笔者审判的实际案例入手,具体分析食药监管类渎职犯罪的犯罪构成及司法认定,以期对该类犯罪的法律认定起到抛砖引玉的作用。笔者通过案例的方式,分析食药类监管犯罪的主体、主观方面等要件,并同时提出在适用相关法律法规时应注意的要点,对司法认定中可能出现的难点提出破解路径,力求形成处理该类犯罪的参考指南。更多还原

【Abstract】 Before the promulgation of the Criminal Law Amendment(Eighth),relevant judicial interpretations on malfeasance crimes in the field of food and drug supervision were issued in 2001 and 2014 respectively by the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate.Among them,the interpretation on the application of laws on the production and sale of fake and inferior commodities was issued in 2001,partially covering the criminal law evaluation on the production and marketing links of food and drug.The interpretation issued in 2014 is directly concerned with the application of the law on drug safety crimes.In addition to the criminal law and relevant judicial interpretations,laws and regulations such as the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China and the Drug Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China in the field of administrative law can serve as important references for identifying malfeasance crimes in the field of food and drug supervision.Although the legislation on food and drug safety has gradually formed a relatively complete system,in the criminal judicial practice,there are still many difficult and controversial problems in accurately identifying malfeasance crimes in the field of food and drug supervision.For example,the identification of the crime of indulging the productionand sale of fake and inferior commodities involves not only the identification of the production and sale of fake and inferior commodities by the person under supervision,but also the identification of the "failure to fulfill the legal responsibilities" and the actual fault of the supervisory subject,etc.In addition,it also involves the limitation of prosecution.In view of the above problems,this paper will take the crime of indulging the production and sale of fake and inferior commodities as an example,and start with the actual cases of the author’s trial to specifically analyze the criminal composition and judicial identification of malfeasance crimes in the field of food and drug supervision,so as to play a role in guiding the legal application and identification of such crimes.The author analyzes the subject,subjective aspect and other elements of the crimes in the field of food and drug supervision through the way of case study,and puts forward the key points that should be paid attention to when applying relevant laws and regulations,and the path of cracking in judicial determination,so as to form a reference guide to deal with this kind of crime.更多还原