【作者】 王杰；

【导师】 韩明；

【作者基本信息】 广西师范大学 ， 中国语言文学， 2019， 硕士

【摘要】 无论是在语法中还是在对外汉语教学中,副词研究尤其是近义副词对比研究都十分重要。然而,对于一些新兴的副词及其近义副词对比研究还尚不完善,“只是”与“光是”便是其中一对。二者都可用在动词、形容词前,都可表示动作、行为的持续、反复,但有些情况下二者可以互换,有些情况下则不能。因此,本文拟从语义与语用的角度对二者进行考察,以期能较为清晰地探究二者的异同。本文共分为五个部分。第一部分为前言,介绍了本文的选题目的与缘由、选题意义、研究现状与存在问题、研究方法、语料选择等问题。第二部分是与“只是”和“光是”相关的问题。包括“只是”与“光是”的词汇化过程、“只是”与“光是”及其“不X”式的辨析、“只是_[副]”的“光是_[副]”的基本意义等问题。“只是”成词于唐代,“光是”成词于明代,“不只是”、“不光是”并非单纯是由二者前加否定副词“不”形成的,而是“不只”与“不光”成词后与焦点标记“是”结合而成。第三部分是“只是”与“光是”在语义成分和语义指向上的异同。本文在整理前人研究成果的基础上,首先对二者的释义词进行了考察,然后结合语料,将二者的义项进行描写、归纳,最终得出“只是”有9个义项,“光是”有7个义项。“只是”与“光是”有7个共同语义特征,2个区别特征,共同语义特征下二者可相互替换,区别语义特征下不可替换。最后我们以此为基础上解释了二者可替换与不可替换的情况。在语义指向上,我们考察了二者在对举结构与非对举结构中的语义指向的不同表现,并提出对举结构对“只是”、“光是”的语义指向的优先性并非破坏,而是增殖。第四部分是“只是”与“光是”在语用方面的差异。本文考察了二者在书面语与口语、在篇章中的衔接性、意向性及情景性等方面的异同。第五部分为全文总结。更多还原

【Abstract】 The study of adverb,especially the ones with the same meaning and using ways,is very important in syntax or teaching Chinese as a foreign language.However,the studies on homoionym and emerging adverbs needs to be strengthened,for instance,“zhishi” and“guangshi”.both of them are located in front of the verbs and adjectives to indicate the repetition or the continuation of an action or manner.However,in some cases they can be interchanged,and in some cases they can’t.Accordingly,this article intends to analyse the similarities and differences of“zhishi” and “guangshi”from semantic and pragmatic point of view.This paper consists of five elements.The first part is preface which describes the reasons and significance of the topic,research status and the existing problems of the study of “zhishi” and “guangshi”,and research methods and corpus selection.The second part is a series of related issues about “zhishi” and “guangshi”,which concludes the lexicalization of “zhishi” and “guangshi”,the difference between “zhishi” and “guangshi”and “buXshi”,and the basic meaning of the two adverbs.The adverb “zhishi” become a word around the Tang Dynasty,and “guangshi” around the Ming Dynasty.he grammatical units“buguangshi” and “buzhishi” does not consists of negative adverb “bu” and “zhishi” or“guagnshi”.when “buzhi” and “buguang” become word,they conmbine focus sign “shi”.The third part is the semantic comparison of “zhishi” and “guangshi”,and his part is divided into two parts.The first one is the semantic similarities and differences between “zhishi”and “guangshi”.Through semantic feature analysis,to make sure the of semantic similarities and differences.“zhishi”has nine semantic features,and “guangshi” has seven semantic features.When they bear the same semantic features,we usually rade one word of them with the aother in a sentence.On the contrary,when they can’t bear the the same semantic features or “zhishi” has some distinctive meaning features which “guangshi” doesn’t possess,we can’t exchange them in a sentence.The second part is a comparison of “zhishi” and “guangshi” from semantic orientation.We looked at the different performance of them in contrastive structures and common structures.Beyond that,we point out that the semantic orientation of “zhishi” and“guangshi” in contrastive structures is part of the whole semantic orientation.The forth part describes the similarities and differences between “zhishi” and “guangshi”from pragmatics.The last part is the summary of the paper.更多还原