【作者】 刘爽；

【导师】 王继福；

【作者基本信息】 燕山大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2018， 硕士

【摘要】 2000年以来我国北京、深圳和浙江等省市相继出台了有关于民事执行听证制度的试行办法,在实际运行中取得了显著的成果。但是,由于我国尚未制定统一的民事执行听证制度的法律规则,导致各个省市在试行执行听证制度时出现大量的不规范现象,因此,该制度的统一规范和完善具有十足的必要性。民事执行听证制度的设计和建立,可以弥补我国现行立法中的空白,有助于我国民事执行工作的有效展开,保障生效判决能够得到顺利的实现。民事执行听证制度的设立改变了之前当事人双方“背对背”的执行局面,保障了司法的公平、公正原则的实现。同时也能够保障民事执行的透明度,制约权力的滥用。本文运用文献分析法、比较分析法和实证分析法,阐明了民事执行听证制度在国内外的规范以及运行状况,归纳出了我国执行听证制度在运行中存在的不足之处,以此为基础总结出其实施时应遵循的基本原则,以及该制度应当在案外人存在异议、变更追加被执行人和多个债权人参与分配等六个方面予以适用,设计了民事执行听证制度在举证、质证、认证以及证明标准等方面的证据规则,同时从听证的主体、组织形式以及具体操作形式对制度的运行进行了详细的设计,并且对在听证过程如何引导和规范当事人合法、合理的行使权力进行了论述,最后指出了在执行听证过程中要严格落实裁执分离的规定,以保障执行听证的规范性。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since 2000,China,Beijing,Shenzhen,Zhejiang and other provinces and cities have successively issued trial methods for civil enforcement hearing system,and achieved remarkable results in actual operation.However,since China has not yet formulated a unified legal rule for civil execution hearing system,many provinces and municipalities have experienced a lot of irregularities in the trial implementation of the hearing system.Therefore,the uniform regulation and improvement of the system is of great necessity.The design and establishment of the civil execution hearing system can make up for the gaps in China’s current legislation,help the effective implementation of civil enforcement work,and ensure that the effective judgment can be smoothly implemented.The establishment of the civil execution hearing system has changed the implementation of the "back-to-back" situation of both parties before.At the same time,it can also guarantee the transparency of civil execution and restrict the abuse of power.This paper uses the literature analysis method,comparative analysis method and empirical analysis method to clarify the norms and operation status of the civil execution hearing system,and summarizes the shortcomings of the implementation of the hearing system.The basic principles that should be followed when implementing it: the objection of the outsider,the change of the additional executor and the participation of multiple creditors,and the civil execution hearing system is designed for evidence,cross-examination and certification.As well as the rules of evidence in terms of certification standards,the author also elaborates the operation of the system from the main body,organizational form and specific operational forms of the hearing,and discusses how to guide and regulate the legitimate and reasonable exercise of powers of the parties during the hearing process.Finally,it pointed out that in the process of executing the hearing,the provisions on separation of powers should be strictly implemented to guarantee the standardization of the execution of hearings.更多还原