【作者】 马涛；

【导师】 肖建飞；

【作者基本信息】 新疆大学 ， 法律硕士（法学）（专业学位）， 2019， 硕士

【摘要】 最高人民法院通过创制、实施公共政策,执行党和政府的决策部署,解决法律适用争议问题,实现公平审判。文中,笔者考察司法解释、司法文件、典型性案例制度在污染环境罪中的司法适用情况,反思最高法院公共政策在环境污染刑事司法实践中的不足。探索如何完善环境污染刑事司法中的公共政策,推进生态文明建设。本文正文包括三个部分:第一部分,笔者通过分析环境污染刑事司法中最高法院公共政策的运行现状,考察我国污染环境罪的处罚现状及变化趋势,即最高法院公共政策在环境污染刑事司法中的创制方式、理念及司法效果的变化。第二部分是本文研究重点,笔者以污染环境刑事司法实践为分析对象,分析相关司法解释、司法文件、典型性案例在污染环境罪司法实践中的作用;反思最高法院公共政策在环境污染刑事司法实践中的不足,即司法解释有扩大立法的嫌疑,司法文件与保障个案公正之间存在矛盾,指导性案例的指导作用缺位,典型性案例示范效果尚不明显。第三部分,针对上述问题笔者提出如下解决路径。其一,坚持政策创制适度考虑政治因素、克服政策创制中的立法倾向两个原则;其二,在具体创制方式上,应注重实现司法解释的规范化,限缩司法文件的导向作用,强化指导性案例的参照效力,注重典型性案例的示范效果。更多还原

【Abstract】 The Supreme People’s Court solves disputes over the application of law and achieves fair trial through the creation and implementation of public policies,the implementation of decision-making arrangements of the Party and the government.In this paper,the author investigates the judicial application of judicial interpretation,judicial documents and typical case system in the crime of environmental pollution,and reflects on the deficiencies of the public policy of the Supreme People’s Court in the criminal judicial practice of environmental pollution.Explore how to improve public policies in criminal justice of environmental pollution and promote the construction of ecological civilization.The main body of this article includes three parts: The first part,through the analysis of the operation of the public policy of the Supreme Court in the criminal justice of environmental pollution,investigates the current situation and changing trend of the punishment of the crime of environmental pollution in China,that is,the change of the creation mode,concept and judicial effect of the public policy of the Supreme Court in the criminal justice of environmental pollution.The second part is the focus of this paper.The author takes the criminal judicial practice of environmental pollution as the object of analysis to analyze the role of relevant judicial interpretations,judicial documents and typical cases in the judicial practice of environmental pollution crimes.The author also reflects on the deficiencies of the public policy of the Supreme Court in the criminal judicial practice of environmental pollution,that is,judicial interpretations have the suspicion of expanding legislation,judicial documents and guaranteeing the fairness of cases.There are contradictions,the guiding role of guiding cases is absent,and the demonstration effect of typical cases is not obvious.In the third part,the author puts forward the following solutions to the above problems.Firstly,we should adhere to the two principles of moderately considering political factors and overcoming legislative tendencies in policy creation;secondly,we should pay attention to the standardization of judicial interpretation,limit the guiding role of judicial documents,strengthen the reference effect of guiding cases,and pay attention to the demonstration effect of typical cases.更多还原