【作者】 张旭；

【导师】 曲长祥； 闫文义；

【作者基本信息】 东北农业大学 ， 公共管理硕士（专业学位）， 2019， 硕士

【摘要】 随着我国社会经济的迅速发展,越来越多的生态环境问题开始逐渐显现,特别是水环境污染问题,长期以来一直得不到有效解决,其中,水环境治理面临的“多龙治水”格局是导致这一困境的重要原因,河长制这一制度创新正式为了解决这一难题应运而生。2016年底中央开始在全国外围内广泛推行河长制,2017年开始,绥化市按照黑龙江省统一的安排部署开展河长制工作推行工作。经过一年多的时间,绥化市河长制体系初步建立完成,建立了市、县、乡、村四级河长体系,建立了相应的组织机构,并逐步显现治理成效。但随着工作推进的逐渐深入,其中存在很多不足和漏洞开始逐渐显现,在河长认识方面、河长制开展工作方面、考核问责方面以及社会公众参与方面的问题开始困扰着绥化市河长制发挥其应有的作用。面对这样的情况,本文通过对绥化市以及其下属各县的河长制办公室工作实际情况进行调查研究,对全国开展河长工作较早的、取得成效显著的以及做出改进和创新的江苏省、浙江省、江西省等省份的河长制工作开展经验进行总结和分析,并与绥化市进行比较,剖析绥化市河长制工作面临问题的原因。首先是缺少法律法规基础做支撑,使得河长制工作仍然停留在行政力量驱动的层面,“人治”的色彩多过“法治”。其次是河长办工作力量薄弱,作为承担河长制具体工作的主要机构,河长办的运行机制、人员力量等方面还达不到要求。再次是考核问责机制还不够健全,考核指标设置还要更加科学,奖惩机制也要更加明确,使其达到对河长的约束监督作用。最后是宣传引导不到位,社会公众对河长制的认可度和参与意识还有待提高。面对绥化市河长制面临的困境,本文有针对性的从加快推进河长制立法工作、加强河长办工作力量、健全完善考核问责机制、加强社会舆论宣传四个角度提出了改进意见。一方面对绥化市接下来的河长制工作提供改进方向和思路,另一方面也希望能够给相邻省市河长制推行工作提供一定的借鉴意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the rapid development of social economy in China,More and more ecological and environmental problems are beginning to emerge,The problem of water environmental pollution has not been effectively solved for a long time,Among them,the "multi-dragon water control" pattern of water environmental governance is an important reason for this predicament,and the system innovation of river chiefs system formally came into being to solve this problem.At the end of 2016,the central government began to widely implement the river chiefs system in the periphery of the country.From 2017,Suihua City began to implement the river chiefs system according to the unified arrangement of Heilongjiang Province.After more than a year,the river chiefs system of Suihua City has been initially established,and the four-level river chiefs system of city,county,Township and village has been established.The corresponding organization has been established,and the control effect has been gradually shown.However,with the gradual deepening of the work,many shortcomings and loopholes began to emerge.The problems of river chiefs recognition,river chiefs system development,assessment and accountability,and public participation began to plague Suihua City’s river chiefs system to play its due role.Faced with such a situation,This paper investigates and studies the actual situation of the river chiefs office work in Suihua City and its subordinate counties,The work of Jiangsu,Zhejiang and Jiangxi provinces has been carried out earlier and achieved remarkable results.Improvements and innovations have been made.This paper summarizes and analyses their experiences,compares them with Suihua City,and analyses the causes of problems faced by the work of river chiefs system in Suihua City.Firstly,the lack of laws and regulations to support the river chiefs system still remains at the level driven by administrative forces,and the "rule of man" is more colorful than the "rule of law".Secondly,the strength of the river chiefs office is weak.As the main body undertaking the specific work,the operation mechanism and personnel strength of the river chiefs office are still not up to the requirements.Thirdly,the assessment accountability mechanism is not perfect enough,the assessment indicators should be set more scientifically,and the reward and punishment mechanism should be clearer so as to achieve the restrictive and supervisory role of river chiefs.Finally,the propaganda and guidance are not in place,and the public’s recognition of the river chiefs system and awareness of participation need to be improved.Faced with the dilemma of river chiefs system in Suihua City,this paper puts forwardsuggestions for improvement from four perspectives: speeding up river chiefs system legislation,strengthening river chiefs system office work force,improving and perfecting assessment and accountability mechanism,and strengthening public opinion propaganda.On the one hand,it will improve the direction and ideas of the river chiefs system in Suihua City.On the other hand,it will also provide some reference for the implementation of river chiefs system in neighboring provinces and cities.更多还原