【作者】 李燕；

【导师】 吴双全；

【作者基本信息】 兰州大学 ， 法学·法学硕士， 2017， 硕士

【摘要】 (间接)故意杀人罪与故意伤害(致死)罪直接侵害的是人的生命权和身体健康权,不但人身危险性较大,而且对被害人身体和生命造成的伤害有时是无法弥补的。行为人若实施了故意杀人或故意伤害行为,因这两种行为在不同方面都具有一定的相似性,导致司法办案中时常会对这两个罪名的定性上产生错误。一直以来对故意杀人罪与故意伤害罪进行区别,是依据刑法条文的规定对侵害行为做出准确的处罚,也是对罪刑法定及罪责刑相适应这两个刑法基本原则的顺应。只有较为准确地将故意杀人罪与故意伤害罪有所界定,才能使刑法规定的罪名正确适用到具体案件中,并按照相关规定来对犯罪行为进行法律制裁。实践中,比较二罪的法定最高刑是相同的(二罪的法定最高刑都是死刑),公检法的办案人员就会对此类案件不认真区分和研究。这样的办案思维不仅不顺应罪刑法定与罪责刑相适应原则的要求,也会发生案件诉判不一、轻罪重判或重罪轻判情况的增加。本文通过对付万鑫致人死亡案的分析,结合司法实践,综合全案,通盘分析被告人的主观心态,尤其考虑案发原因,被告人的认知能力、被害人的体质特征、侵害的部位与实施行为的力度,所实施的危害行为方式等多种因素进行治罪,对如何把握和判断到底是构成(间接)故意杀人罪还是构成故意伤害(致死)罪,提出合理化的建议。本选题的研究内容包括以下几个方面,其中第二、第三方面是研究的重点,具体如下:第一,本案的讨论分析。通过对付万鑫致人死亡一案案情的简要介绍,引出本案二种不同的争议观点,进而分别对每一种观点进行概括梳理,分析其中涉及的法律问题。第二,比较分析。针对该案例引出的二种观点,即付万鑫的行为构成(间接)故意杀人罪还是故意伤害(致死)罪?对以上争议焦点分别进行系统的比较论证分析,从而阐明二者之间的区别及如何定性。第三,(间接)故意杀人罪和故意伤害(致死)罪区别标准的讨论研究。第四,对于本案认定何罪的分析。结论部分是通过前面对案例详细的论证基础上,对付万鑫的行为构成何罪进行整体评价,提出对司法审判实践的一些建议,以期对实务工作有所裨益。更多还原

【Abstract】 Crimes of intentional homicide(indirect)and injury(death)have direct infringement on human rights to life and physical health,with not only great dangerousness of the person but also irreparable damages to body and life of the aggrieved person.If intentional homicide or injury is performed by a man,mistakes can usually occur in determining nature of the two crimes during judicial processing of the case,due to certain similarity of the two activities in many aspects.All the time,distinguishing crimes of intentional homicide and injury is based on provisions of articles in penal law to issue a precise punishment for injurious act.The distinguishing is also a conformity to principles of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime and of compatibility of crime,responsibility and punishment.Only crimes of intentional homicide and injury are defined clearly can accusation prescribed by penal law be applied to specific cases accurately and criminal act be legally sanctioned according to related provisions.In terms of practice,because maximum statutory sentence of the two crimes is identical,both being death penalty,investigators of public security organs are used to differentiate and study such cases carelessly.This kind of attitude is not in accord with requirements of principles of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime and of compatibility of crime,responsibility and punishment.Meanwhile,differences between charge and trial,serious punishment for misdemeanors and under-punishment will increase accordingly.Through an analysis of Fu Wanxin Case causing death to another person,a combination of juridical practices and overall consideration of the case,the thesis mainly analyzes subjective feelings of the defendant,the causes,cognitive competence of the defendant,constitutive character and injured part of the victim as well as the strength and way of the behavior for convicting the defendant.In addition,reasonable suggestions to analyze and determine crimes of intentional homicide(indirect)and injury(death)are put forward.The contents of this study are comprised by following aspects,thesecond and third part of which being the keys of the study.The first part is a discussion and analysis of the case.Through a simple introduction to Fu Wanxin Case causing death to another person,two different disputed opinions are brought forward.Then,the two opinions are generalized and analyzed respectively,and involved legal problems are analyzed.The second part is comparative analysis.It focus on the second opinion of the case,namely whether crime of intentional homicide(indirect)or intentional injury(death)is caused by the behavior of Fu Wanxin.Afterwards,a comparative argument and analysis of the two disputed points are conducted systematically to show their differences and how to determine the nature.The third part is a discussion and study of the standards for distinguishing crimes of intentional homicide(indirect)and injury(death).The forth part is an analysis of what crime is charged.Based on detailed arguments above,the conclusion part is a general evaluation of what crime being committed by Fu Wanxin.What’s more,some suggestions on judicial judgment are put forward,with the hope of being beneficial to practices in the future.更多还原