【作者】 陈飞；

【导师】 张晓玲；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 法律硕士（法学）（专业学位）， 2016， 硕士

【摘要】 为了推动服务型政府建设,我国从中央到地方各层面都在进行政府购买公共服务方面的立法尝试。相比较而言,学界对这一现状所引起的争论更为激烈。首先对购买公共服务这种行为的性质,就持异议,由此也必然造成了对购买公共服务的合同性质理解上的差异。如果从法律关系入手,可以认为本文中所指明的合同是一种行政合同。购买者和承接者的双方地位不平等,甚至于合同内容也不完全是私法意思自治的产物。目前我国政府正处于转型的关键时刻,这种合同完全可以被当做一种管理手段,实现某些领域的职能服务转型。但是在应用这种新工具的同时,也必须认识到该合同有着不同于一般民事合同的特点,从主体上看,主要包括政府组织(购买者)和承接主体(承接者)。从客体上看,由于合同服务的对象是社会公众,这又涉及到三方利益。从内容上看,在要约、承诺乃至于最终达成合意的过程中,必须体现对公共利益的维护和尊重,因此就需要通过各种方式限制缔约双方的意思自治,简言之,在这份既能够体现契约性又能够体现行政性的合同中,如何寻求两者的价值平衡是最大的难点。如果在依法行政和意思自治两个原则上谋求到了一个价值平衡,那么也只能说明购买公共服务合同成立了,并不当然生效。不同于合同成立,合同效力主要体现在主体资格、意思表示以及购买领域上,这涉及到法律对于该合同的有效性评价问题。在合同签订前后的不同阶段,合同在主体资格、购买内容等方面存在瑕疵,那么对合同效力会造成不同影响,相应地也会采用不同的归责原则,其救济手段也就不一样。更多还原

【Abstract】 In order to promote the construction of service-oriented government, China’s central and local governments are legislation to try public service. In comparison, the academic debate on the current situation caused by the more intense. First, the nature of the procurement of public services, it is dissent, which also inevitably lead to differences of understanding public service contracts. If we start from the legal relationship, the contract may be considered as administrative contract. From the body point of view, buyers and takers unequal status of the two sides, and even the contents of the contract is not entirely the product of private autonomy. Our government is at a crucial moment of transition, such contracts can be used as a management tool to achieve service transformation functions in certain areas. But at the same time the application of this new tool, it must be recognized that the contract has even different from the general civil contract, from the body point of view, including governmental organizations(purchaser) and society organizations(takers). From the object point of view, because the object is the public contracts and services, which in turn relates to the tripartite interests. From the content point of view, the offer, acceptance and even desirable in the process of reaching the final, must reflect the public interest safeguarded and respected, and therefore need a variety of ways to limit the autonomy of the contracting parties, in short, both in this to reflect to reflect contractual and administrative contracts, how to find the balance between the value of the greatest difficulty. If you seek to principles of administrative law in both autonomy and a balanced value, it only shows that the purchase of public service contracts set up, of course, does not take effect. Unlike establishing of the contract,, this relates to the legal validity of contracts for the evaluation. At various stages before and after the signing of the contract, the contract flaws in the qualification, purchase content, then the validity of the contract will result in different effects, and accordingly will be different responsibility principle, its remedies are not the same.更多还原