节点文献

省级行政审批权力清单制度实施比较研究

Contrastive Study on the Practice of Administrative Examination and Approval Power List among Local Governments

【作者】 李霞

【导师】 陈升;

【作者基本信息】 重庆大学 , 公共管理, 2016, 硕士

【副题名】以渝、豫、浙为例

【摘要】 行政审批是计划经济的产物,行政审批制度改革是为了更好服务于经济社会的发展。传统的审批制度已严重阻碍了市场经济快速发展。而行政审批权力清单就是在新时代背景下对体制改革的重要创新。自审批权力清单制度提出以来,中央到地方均对审批权力清单制度进行了积极的探索和实践。截止2015年底,央地各政府均在政务网上公布了权力清单。部分省市同时还公布了相应的责任清单,力求做到“法无授权不可为,法定职责必须为”。但是行政审批权力清单制度是否得到有效落实?相关的配套制度是否完善?是否促进了简政放权和政府职能的转变?本文选择国务院、重庆市、浙江省和河南省为分析样本,利用各政务网上公布的权力审批清单、责任清单以及近三年有关取消调整行政审批的文件,从审批事项变迁、公布的审批权力事项、相关的配套制度等方面对各地审批权力清单制度进行对比分析。研究结果表明,现阶段行政审批权力清单进行较为顺利,均按照要求对审批权力事项进行了清理,公布了审批事项,建立了相应的配套制度,政府职能得到一定程度的转变。但仍存在很多问题:梳理口径不统一、经济领域审批事项仍过多、地方改革空间有限、审批权力清单配套制度不完善等。

【Abstract】 The system of Administrative examination and approval power list is the key to further reduce and standardize its procedures. The traditional system has seriously hindered the economic and social development. Power list is an important innovation to solve this problem. At the end of 2015, both central and local governments published their own power list; some of them even posted their duties as well. However, did the power list system implement well? Did it promote the transformation of government functions? Is the supporting system effective? Taking the State Council, Chongqing Municipality, Zhejiang Province and Henan Province as samples, this paper analyzes the power list system about administrative examination and approval from the views of its cleaning, publishing and supporting systems.The research finds out power lists are well carried out and optimize the roles of government, but there are still some problems: no identical standard, too many items in economic area, difficult to further reform in local government, defective supporting systems.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 重庆大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2017年 03期
  • 【分类号】D630
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】243
节点文献中: