【作者】 陈静；

【导师】 翟国方；

【作者基本信息】 南京大学 ， 城乡规划学， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 全球化背景下城市竞争加剧,城市既要捕捉外部发展的机会窗,提升自身竞争力,又要满足内部居民多样化的需求,带来了内部治理结构和模式的深刻变革。市辖区作为城市次级行政单元,在许多城市的治理结构中扮演了非常重要的角色,特别是中国城市普遍设区。但随着城镇化的推进和转型的要求,中国城市内部结构日益复杂,特别是在规模上出现了较多的巨型区,区际差异也不断拉大,给城市管理造成了一定困难。当前对规模的研究还未深入到微观领域,另一方面市辖区体制改革和区划调整相关研究虽多,对规模现象和发展机制的研究还不够深入,亟待完善。本文通过引入政治经济分析框架——尺度理论,研究市辖区发展过程中城市及其内部不同主体的尺度斗争,借助中外典型城市的比较分析,揭示出中外市辖区规模的形成机制。本文遵循理论——实证的研究思路,按照尺度政治分析框架,认为市辖区形成过程中的主要尺度斗争主体为城市(大都市区)、市辖区、居民。在将尺度分为相互关联的三要素(规模、等级、关系)的基础上从市辖区规模(包括人口和用地)要素作为主要切入点,分析城市及其内部主体在尺度斗争过程中的规模、等级、关系变化,形成市辖区规模的理论研究框架。在实证部分,通过中、日、韩三国几乎所有市辖区规模数据,以及上海、东京、首尔、伦敦、大阪、柏林、纽约、巴黎的八大城市的详细案例分析,总结中外市辖区规模特征及演变过程,对理论框架进行检验和适用性的补充,构建完整的市辖区规模形成机制。研究认为市辖区规模作为尺度要素,即是社会建构的结果,也是尺度策略。由于中外对尺度要素的内涵界定以及主要的作用主体不完全相同,导致了市辖区规模的差异性,中国市辖区规模相比国外而言整体较大,区际差异大,发展过程呈现出以经济发展为导向的不均衡阶梯状圈层推进。而国外市辖区发展过程中呈现出以经济发展和提升服务双导向的均衡圈层推进。最后对中国市辖区规模发展趋势进行了研判,认为适应未来转型需要,市辖区规模调整要和城市内部尺度政治的调整同步推进。更多还原

【Abstract】 The competition of cities under the background of globalization is intensifying.Apart from the external opportunity should each city to capture for enhancing their competitiveness,to satisfy the diverse demand of their citizens is another challenge.And it has brought profound changes to their internal governance structure and mode.Borough as the sub administration of urban plays a very important role in the structure of governance,especially in Chinese cities.With the tendency of urbanization,the internal structure of cities in China becomes increasingly complex,especially in some huge boroughs.And the increasing gap among boroughs leads some difficulties to city management.Currently,research is not deep into the microcosmic field.On the other hand,besides those on reform and adjustment of regionalization,research on size phenomenon and development mechanism also needs improvement.This paper compares scale development process and scale struggle of different subjects in typical cities in China and foreign countries to reveal the formation mechanism of Chinese and foreign urban borough size through the political and economic framework--scale theory.The research idea follows the theoretical research framework,in accordance with the politic of scale that city(metropolitan),borough,resident are the main subject in the scale battle.The scale consists of three interrelated elements(size,level,and relation)and borough size including population and area is used as study perspective to analyze changes of scale,level and relation in struggle.In the empirical part,Japan and South Korea borough size and several cities including Shanghai,Tokyo,Seoul,London,Osaka,Berlin,New York,Paris are adopted to sum up the characteristics,evolution process of borough and to build a more complete formation mechanism of borough size with making a supplementary test and the applicability to the theory frame.The paper suggests that borough size as a scale factor is not only the result of social construction but also scale strategy.Because of the main connotation of the scale factor and the main subject definition are different between China and foreign countries,which leads to the diverse borough size.Chinese boroughs are much larger in comparison with those in other countries.Chinese borough shows economic development oriented uneven circle development.On the other hand,foreign borough presents to be balance with economic development oriented and service oriented.In the end,this paper infers the trend of Chinese borough size and suggests transition of borough size and adjustment of scale relationship should be synchronous.更多还原