【作者】 陈敏；

【导师】 田思源；

【作者基本信息】 清华大学 ， 法学， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 行政任务的行使,原则上应由政府自行为之,非有法令依据,不应任意交由私部门行使。其用意,不外乎在于避免政府不当转嫁其责任,从而规避公法规范的约束。故台湾地区公私协力的热潮,引起了法学界,尤其是公法学界对政府责任承担的担忧。本文即通过对台湾学术研究成果的系统梳理,分析目前台湾公私协力模式下政府承担责任的范围。在公私协力模式下,很重要的议题是政府责任的分担或共同承担的问题。为分析台湾地区公私协力模式下政府承担的责任范围,本文首先介绍台湾地区公私协力模式的概况,包括起因,法律与政策的发展历程,基本含义以及适用的范围与方式,为后文研究提供基础概念。其次,通过分析不同责任类型,来确定公私协力模式下政府所应承担的责任,即由“给付责任”转向“担保责任”。进而分析政府承担“担保责任”的“宪法”依据及法理支撑。再次,“担保责任”的范围大体上可由法律上的规定和契约中的约定加以限定,通过梳理学术成果及实务中的做法来归纳政府“担保责任”可能的范围。最后,因台湾公私协力模式涉及问题层面广泛,个案差异较大,政府责任承担范围尚无统一的法律法规可以遵循,造成了实务中的困境。故在学术界已有学者开始探讨建立一部统一适用的“担保行政法”,从而规范与界定政府责任的范围。因大陆学术界对台湾此一制度尚未有系统性描述,故本文通过介绍台湾公私协力模式下的政府责任,希望能为大陆学者进行相关研究提供一丝帮助。更多还原

【Abstract】 In principle, the administrative tasks should be exercised by government. Without laws and decrees, the administrative tasks should not be passed on to others. In this way, government cannot avoid the constraints of public regulations by improperly shifting responsibilities to others. The upsurge of public-private partnership in Taiwan District has raised concern of public responsibilities in the circle of laws, especially in the circle of public laws. This thesis systematically summarizes the research results of Taiwan and analyzes the scope of government responsibilities in public-private partnership.In public-private partnership, the sharing or jointly undertaking of government responsibilities is an important issue. To analyze the scope of government responsibilities in public-private partnership in Taiwan District, this thesis firstly introduces the public-private partnership, including the origins, development of laws and policies, basic implications and scope of application. In addition, through analysis of different types of responsibilities, the responsibilities that should be undertaken by government in public-private partnership are made clear, namely from performance liabilities to guarantee responsibilities. Then its constitution base and legal support are proposed. Moreover, by anglicizing the academic achievement and the practice, this paper will try to summary the possible scope of the guarantee responsibilities. Finally, the public-private partnership in Taiwan involves many problems, individual cases differ greatly, and there are not unified laws for the undertaking of government responsibilities, which result in the dilemma in practice. Therefore, some scholars have begun to discuss the establishing of a unified “guarantee administrative laws” to define the scope of government responsibilities. This thesis hopes to provide some help to scholars in Chinese Mainland through introducing government responsibilities in public-private partnership in Taiwan District.更多还原