【作者】 陈丽；

【导师】 陈坤；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 流行病学与卫生统计学（专业学位）， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 目的：构建一种简化定量分析期刊学术质量的新的评价指标体系,为期刊管理部门定性与定量相结合评价学术期刊质量提供参考依据。方法：以《2014年版中国期刊引证报告(扩刊版)》中73种预防医学类期刊为研究对象,利用推荐指标法、主成分分析法和R型聚类分析法对评价期刊的总被引频次、影响因子、即年指标和他引率等17个初始评价指标进行遴选,产生3种新的评价指标体系。采用秩和比法分别对基于初始评价指标体系和3种新的评价指标体系的预防医学类期刊学术质量进行排序。以初始评价指标体系产生的排序结果为基准,采用Spearman秩相关对其和3种新的评价指标体系排序结果进行相关性比较。若新的评价指标体系与初始评价指标体系相关性较高,则说明该评价指标体系可取代初始评价指标体系。为进一步验证新的评价指标体系的可行性,采用Kappa检验对其产生的排序分档结果与期刊是否为核心期刊进行一致性比较。结果：初始指标体系包括影响因子、总被引频次和他引率等17个文献计量学指标,经推荐指标法、主成分分析法和R型聚类分析法共形成3种新的评价指标体系。经Spearman秩相关分析发现基于推荐指标法的期刊学术质量排序结果与基于初始指标体系的排序结果相关性较高(r=0.701,P<0.01)。进一步验证基于新的评价指标体系的期刊排序分档结果与期刊是否为核心期刊的一致性,Kappa值为0.506,具有中度一致性。说明新的指标体系可以取代初始指标体系来评价预防医学类期刊学术质量。新的指标体系包括总被引频次、影响因子、基金论文比、他引率和平均引文数等5个指标。结论：本研究应用推荐指标法初步构建了一个由总被引频次、影响因子、基金论文比、他引率和平均引文数等5个指标组成的,对预防医学类期刊进行定量简化分析的新的评价指标体系。采用基于初始评价指标体系的秩和比法与基于推荐指标法的秩和比法对预防医学类期刊学术质量进行实证研究,结果两种方法评价结果具有较好的一致性。说明基于推荐指标法的秩和比法可取代基于初始评价指标体系的秩和比法。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:To construct a new evaluation index system for quantitative analysis of academic quality of journals and providing a reference for the quality of academic journals.Methods:Initial evaluation index and periodical information sources were from the 2014 edition of Chinese Journal Citation Report (published edition). By the recommended index method, principal component analysis and R clustering analysis method were used to select the initial evaluation index, resulting in three kinds of new evaluation index systems. The academic quality of preventive medicine journals, which were based on initial evaluation index system and three kinds of new evaluation index systems were studied by using rank sum ratio method. Based on the ranking results of the initial evaluation index system, the correlation between the initial evaluation index system and three kinds of new evaluation index systems were adopted by using spearman rank correlation. If the new evaluation index system had a high correlation with the initial evaluation index system, the initial evaluation index system could be replaced by the new evaluation index system. In order to further verify the feasibility of the new evaluation index system, the Kappa test was used to compare the results of the sorting of the results and assess whether the journals were the core journals.Results:The initial index system including impact factor, total citation frequency and the citation rate 17 bibliometric indicators, the recommended index method, principal component analysis method and R cluster analysis were to form three new evaluation index systems. Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that the ranking results of journal academic quality based on the recommendation index method and the ranking results based on the initial index system had a high correlation(r=0.701, P<0.01). To further verify the consistency of the results of the new evaluation index system based on the journal ranking and the consistency of the journal is the core journals, the Kappa value is 0.506, which has a moderate consistency. The new index system can replace the initial index system to evaluate the academic quality of preventive medicine journals. The new index system includes five indexes, that is, total citation frequency, impact factor, the ratio of fund papers, the citation rate and the average citations number.Conclusion:This study used the recommended index method to construct a new evaluation index system which was composed of five indicators, that is, total citation frequency,impact factor, fund paper ratio, the citation rate and average citation number, and so on. Based on the initial evaluation index system, the rank sum ratio method and the method based on the recommended index method for the prevention of medical journals academic quality of the empirical research, the results of the two methods of evaluation results had good consistency. That rank and index method recommended ratio method could replace the evaluation index system based on the initial rank and ratio method based on.更多还原