【作者】 梁栋；

【导师】 李春雷；

【作者基本信息】 北京体育大学 ， 体育教育训练学， 2014， 硕士

【副题名】以安徽男篮为例

【摘要】 本文的研究目的在于比较波动性周期(Undulating-Periodization,简称UP)与阶段(板块)波动性周期(Block Undulating-Periodization,简称BUP)这两种不同波动式负荷的周期训练模式对于中国篮球联赛(NBL)安徽男篮运动员力量和爆发力训练的影响。本研究有16名现役球员参与,平均年龄为23.6岁,均具有4年以上力量训练经验。通过对其力量与爆发力水平进行测试后,分为波动式周期训练组UP(n=8)和阶段波动式周期训练组BUP(n=8)。受试者在试验期间分别在训练前(T1)、6周(T2)、12周(T3)进行4项测试,即1RM卧推、1RM背蹲、原地纵跳、1RM高抓。原地纵跳成绩：T3与Tl比较,UP组和BUP组内均存在显著性差异(P<0.05),组间不存在显著性差异(P>0.05),但BUP组的增长幅度略高于UP组(BUP组：31.1%T1-T3,UP组：25.2%T1-T3)；1RM杠铃高抓成绩：T3与T1比较,BUP组和UP组内均存在显著性差异(P<0.05),组间不存在显著性差异,但BUP组的力量增长幅度高于UP组(BUP组：14.7%TT1-T3,UP组：12.1%T1-T3)；1RM杠铃卧推成绩：T3与T1比较,UP组和BUP组内均存在显著性差异(P<0.05),组间不存在显著性差异,但BUP组的力量增长幅度高于UP组(BUP组：14.3%T1-T3,UP组：11%T1-T3)；1RM杠铃背蹲成绩：T3与T1比较,UP组和BUP组内均存在显著性差异(P<0.05),T3与T1比较组间不存在显著性差异(P<0.05),但BUP组的力量增长幅度低于UP组(BUP组：9.9%T1-T3,UP组：11.4%T1-T3)。两种波动式负荷周期力量与爆发力训练模式对于提高运动员最大力量和爆发力均有较为显著效果,总体看来,BUP的训练效果比UP更有优势,但UP对于发展下肢力量更有优势。对于提高NBL联赛水平的运动员上肢最大力量和爆发力水平,在整个周期中的训练的负荷强度与量阶段性地波动并逐渐提高要比全范围(1-15RM)波动要有优势,对于发展下肢最大力量,负荷全范围波动变化要更有优势。更多还原

【Abstract】 The purpose of this study is to compare the strength and power training effects of Block Undulating-Periodization (BUP) and Undulating-Periodization (UP) in the level of National Basketball League. There were 16 athletes participated in this study whose average age was 23.6 and all of them have more than 4 years strength and power training experience. Subjects were divided into two groups based on the strength testing results. There were 3tests in all,T1,T2 and T3 respectively before the first week, after the 6th week and the 12th week. Every participant were tested by 1RM Hang snatch,1RM Bench press,1RM Back squat and Vertical jump. Compared with the Vertical jump results, there were significant differences between T1 and T3 in both group(P<0.05), no significant differences between two group; the increment were higher in BUP group than UP group(BUP:31.1%T1-T3, UP:25.2%T1-T3). Compared with the 1RM Bench press results, there were significant differences between T1 and T3 in both group(P<0.05), no significant differences between two group; the increment were higher in BUP group than UP group(BUP:14.7%T1T3, UP: 12.1%T1-T3). Compared with the 1RM Hang snatch results, there were significant differences between T1 and T3 in both group(P<0.05), no significant differences between two group; the increment were higher in BUP group than UP group(BUP: 14.3%T1-T3, UP:11%T1-T3). Compared with the 1RM Back squat results, there were significant differences between T1 and T3 in both group(P<0.05),no significant differences between two group; the increment were higher in UP group than BUP group(BUP:9.9%T1-T3, UP:11.4%T1-T3).Based on the results of this study, both methods were effective in develop the strength and power for NBL basketball player. The variability of training intensity ranges in block and increase progressively, were more prevalent in develop the upper-body strength power and explosiveness; as the training intensity ranges from power and 1RM to 15RM during the whole period, which were more prevalent for lower-body strength.更多还原