【作者】 高洁；

【导师】 杨会永；

【作者基本信息】 郑州大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2015， 硕士

【摘要】 违法建筑作为当前社会的一种特殊现象,如何正确认定其范围和依法定程序拆除,不仅是个社会问题,而且也是个亟待完善的法律问题。行政强制法实施以前,对违法建筑强制拆除的有关规定不统一,行政执法机关的行政执法实践操作也繁多冗杂,对法制的统一性造成了严重影响,损害了法律的权威。尽管《行政强制法》的出台对强制拆除违法建筑行为的执行程序做出了规定,在一定程度上对这一问题的法律适用做了统一,规范了强制拆除违法建筑的行为,但是,有的程序设定的还比较原则,需要进一步的完善和改进,有一些具体程序的定性问题还存在分歧。由于行政机关对于强制拆除过程中的相关行为存在认识的偏差,导致程序的法律适用存在与法律规定有不一致的情形产生。而且之前出台的强制拆除违法建筑相关法律法规与《行政强制法》的现行条文也存在冲突的情形,理解上容易产生歧义,执法实践的做法并不统一。这些不仅需要进行更深入的理论研究,也需要通过行政机关的执法实践进行不断的总结。本文试图从违法建筑入手,阐述不同类型的违法建筑对强制拆除行为定性的影响,对当前学界对于强制拆除违法建筑行为法律属性的争议做出梳理分析,明确强制拆除违法建筑行为性质是行政强制执行,同时与当前相关的法律法规加以结合,指出行政机关对此存在的认识差异。最后,在强制拆除的法律程序的法律适用上,指出其中所需要注意的问题。文章内容分为五章,第一章绪论,根据我国行政机关目前对强制拆除违法建筑定性的认识情况,交代了本文的写作背景,阐述了文章的研究目的和价值,明确了文章的写作思路和总体的框架结构。第二章是违法建筑的类型与强制拆除违法建筑行为之间存在的关联。从违法建筑的类型展开,指出不同类型的违法建筑由不同的主管部门出台相关办法作进一步细分的规制,由于各主管行政机关对强制拆除的性质认识存在差别,致使强制拆除行为存在做法不一的现状。第三章着重从学理角度探讨了强制拆除违法建筑行为的法律性质,同时也对争议颇多的责令限期拆除行为的性质也做出了分析和认定。第四章强制拆除违法建筑程序的法律适用,着重分析了执行主体和听证制度的应用。最后一章是结语,该部分概括和总结了全文内容,并且提炼出了文章的论点。更多还原

【Abstract】 Illegal construction is a special phenomenon in the current society, how to correctly identify the scope and demolite according to legal procedures, is not only a social problem, but also is an urgent need to improve the legal issues. Before the implementation of administrative enforcement law, the relevant provisions of the mandatory removal of illegal construction is not uniform, administrative enforcement practice of administrative law enforcement agencies also operate numerous miscellaneous, seriously affected the unity of the rule of law and the authority of law. Despite the introduction of "administrative enforcement" of mandatory removal of illegal construction acts to make provision for the implementation of the program, to a certain extent, on the issue of applicable law makes unified, standardized behavior forced removal of illegal construction, however, some rules are principles, imperfect and specific, some of the nature of the positioning program is still controversial. Since the administrative organ have bias on the forced removal process related behavior, leading to legal procedures for the application of the law is inconsistent with the existence of circumstances produced. And the forced demolition of illegal structures of law by the relevant laws and regulations and the act of administrative enforcement of existing rules also exists conflict situation, understanding is easy to produce ambiguity, the practice of law enforcement practice is not unified. These are not only the need for more in-depth theoretical research, but also by law enforcement needs to be constantly practice the executive summary.This article attempts to start from the illegal construction, expounds the different types of illegal building influence on qualitative forced demolition behavior, For the current academic mandatory removal of illegal construction behavior legal property disputes combing analysis,makes the forced removal of illegal construction is the administrative enforcement acts of nature clear, and combining with the current relevant laws and regulations, administrative organs to the understanding of the differences are pointed out. Finally, on the forced demolition of the legal procedures applicable law, the problems which need to pay attention to are pointed out. Content of the article is divided into five chapters, the first chapter introduction, according to our administrative organ’s current understanding of qualitative forced demolition of illegal structures, narrates the writing background of this article, the article expatiates the research purpose and value, lists the article thinking and frame structure. The second chapter is illegal building types associated with forced demolition of behavior. From illegal building types, points out those different types of illegal structures of the different departments issued relevant measures for further subdivision of the regulation, due to the competent administrative authorities know there is a difference on the nature of forced demolition, the status quo of the forced demolition behavior exist there. The third chapter discusses the theoretical perspective of the legal nature of mandatory removal of illegal construction behavior, but also on the nature of a lot of controversy shall be ordered to dismantle behavior also made analysis and identification. Chapter iv forced demolition of illegal building program applicable law, this paper analyzes the application of executive main body and the hearing system. The last part is conclusion, summarise the full text, on the basis of the full text argument for refining.更多还原