【作者】 张君；

【导师】 孙延明； 张湘粤；

【作者基本信息】 华南理工大学 ， 工业工程， 2014， 硕士

【摘要】 近年来，职业教育、技工教育在国家政策的大力支持下，得到了跨越式的发展，然而技工院校的教学水平却层次不齐，差异很大，如何提高技工院校的教学水平日益得到专家学者的关注。本文从职业教育（技工教育）的现状入手，在分析、总结国内的技工院校教学评价体系和模式的基础上，结合ZS技师学院的教育教学特点，采用AHP层次分析方法、模糊综合评价方法，构建以学生、同事、督导、教师为评价主体的教学质量多元评价体系模型。即教学评价主体包含学生、同事、督导、教师（自身）4大主体，各主体的评价指标由文献法和头脑风暴法制定，并由AHP层次分析法确立各指标的权重，避免人为主观赋值，最终使用模糊综合评价法评判评价结果。教学评价结果通过反馈机制，使得教学评价真正能起到促进教师教学业务的提高，提高技工院校的办学质量的目的，文本还将该模型运用于ZS技师学院XXX系部的教学评价平台加以验证模型的科学性和准确性。更多还原

【Abstract】 In recent years, vocational education\technical education in support of national policy,has been developing rapidly.But, levels of the teaching of natural mechanic institutions isuneven and varys widely。Experts and scholars concern about how to improve the standard ofmechanic institution’s teaching.In this paper, start from the status of vocational education (technical education), in thebasis of summarizing domestic mechanic institutions teaching evaluation system and patterns,,combined with the characteristics of mechanics education institutions, using AHP AnalyticHierarchy method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, to build students；colleagues；supervisors；teachers for the evaluation of multi-subject teaching evaluation system model.That is the main teaching evaluation includes students, colleagues, supervisors, teachers(themselves)4large main evaluation index developed by each body of literature andbrainstorming, by establishing the right of each index, to avoid human subjective assignmentof AHP, Evaluation of the results of the final evaluation using fuzzy comprehensiveevaluation method.Teaching evaluation results through a feedback mechanism, makes teaching evaluationcan really play to improve the promotion of the business of teaching, improves mechaniccolleges’ teaching quality, in the text the model will be teaching evaluation platform ZSXXX College Department of the Ministry of validated models Science and accuracy.更多还原