【作者】 曹玲；

【导师】 王飞跃；

【作者基本信息】 中南大学 ， 法学， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 民间借贷虚假诉讼侵财行为是指当事人之间基于获取财产权利或财产利益的不法目的,恶意串通,采取伪造、改造借条等证据的方式,虚构民间借贷法律关系和争议,向法院提起诉讼,企图利用法院的调解书或生效裁判的效力对抗他人,从而使自己的财产转移或转移他人的财产,扰乱司法秩序进而侵害他人财产权或财产利益的诉讼行为。该行为的类型具有多样性,根据法益保护的角度可以分为侵害财产权利型和侵害财产利益型,根据被害人是否知晓以及真实的基础法律关系是否存在也可分为不同的类型,这些分类标准直接影响着定罪量刑。目前由于缺乏统一的立法指导,我国刑事司法实践对该行为的定性普遍出现同案不同判、甚至盲目扩张解释的混乱情况。虽然我国现有的刑法罪名对该行为的不同类型可以进行部分评价,如诈骗罪、敲诈勒索罪、虚假破产罪、拒不执行判决裁定罪以及拒不支付劳动报酬罪等,但依然存在障碍,无法就该行为对司法秩序的侵害进行评价,存在评价不全甚至对某些类型不能评价的问题。新设虚假诉讼罪是规制民间借贷虚假诉讼侵财行为最理想的选择,具有合理性和必要性。该犯罪行为侵害的主要客体是司法秩序,如果行为人同时侵害了其他法益,构成其他罪名则可以运用罪数理论进行分析,这样既维护了司法秩序,又保护了其他法益,能恰当地对民间借贷虚假诉讼侵财行为定罪量刑。更多还原

【Abstract】 The false lawsuit of private lending to infringe property mainly means that the parties with malicious collusion to obtain the property right or interests based on the unlawful purpose, through forging or transforming evidence, fabricating private lending relationship and disputes, then suing to the court, they want to achieve the mediation or the valid judgment to against others so that the property would be transferred. These may damage the judicial order and others’property rights or interests. The behavior’s types have diversities, and according to the angle of rechtsgut’s protection, it can be divided into the property rights’infringement and property interests’infringement. The victim knows or not as well as if the basic legal relationship exists may also influence the conviction. Owing to the lacking of legislative guidance at present, the criminal judicial practice may make different sentence on the same case or even out-expansion explanations in our country. Although the criminal law can evaluate the part of this different types of behavior, such as fraud, racketeering sin, the crime of false bankruptcy, refusing to implement the judgment against the crime and the crime of refusing to pay the remuneration and so on, the short-coming is that these ways can’t evaluate the behavior’s harmless bringing to the judicial order and even can’t evaluate the whole false lawsuit of private lending. Creating false lawsuit crime is the most ideal way to regulate false lawsuit of private lending to infringe property. This crime mainly damages the judicial order, and if parties infringe other legal benefits, we can use the theory of the quantity of crime to analyze the final criminal regulation to the parties. These may not only maintain the judicial order, but also protect the other legal benefits, and can make the proper conviction and sentencing to the false lawsuit of private lending to infringe property.更多还原