【作者】 李平；

【导师】 张卫良； 夏智伦；

【作者基本信息】 中南大学 ， 公共管理， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 自1952年“人民助学金”制度出台以来,为适应社会发展和高等教育自身发展的需要,同时解决贫困大学生在校期间的经济困难,国家制定了一系列的助学政策。2007年我国新的国家助学金政策正式确立至今也有6年的时间了,在此期间该项政策的实施解决了我国高校特别是高职院校许多贫困学生的实际困难,体现了政府的公共管理职能。但同时,该项政策本身所存在的缺陷在新形势下又一定程度上影响了政府公共管理职能的实现效率。本文通过对相关文献资料的搜集、整理和分析,了解了我国高校助学金政策的发展历史及各阶段的相关规定,和近年来普通高校助学金政策的执行情况。同时对长沙市两所高职院校进行实地调研和访谈,调查、分析了目前学生对国家助学金政策的认知情况及该项政策的实际执行效果。综合各方面的调查研究发现当前我国现行的高校国家助学金政策本身存在价值取向不明确；资助对象认定体系不科学等问题。同时,在政策执行过程中存在执行主体不独立,不专业；宣传工作不到位；名额分配制度僵化；心理救助缺失等问题。通过对比美国、英国、日本等发达国家在高校助学金政策方面的不同处理办法,及其各自所取得的成效和先进经验。对我国现行的国家助学金政策提出以下改革意见：对于政策本身,要明确价值取向；制定科学的认定标准和评定程序。在政策执行过程中做到明确执行主体,强化其职能；加大宣传力度；设立资助政策“套餐”；加大复核力度,建立长效监督机制；加强心理救助。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since the "People’s Grants" system was introduced in1952. The state has formulated a series of educational policies to meet the needs by social development and higher education’s development, conclusively in order to solve students’economic problems at school. The National Grants system has been formally established for nearly6years since2007. During these years, the implementation of the policy has solved many poor students’practical difficulties in universities, especially some vocational colleges and achieved the government’s public management functions. But at the same time, under the new situation and to a certain extent, the existence of defects in the policy itself has affected negatively the government’s public management functions to achieve efficiency.This paper adopts the methods of literature data collection, collation and analysis to explain the development of the policies of university scholarships, various historical stages of the relevant provisions and college scholarships implementation of the policies in recent years. Meanwhile, in order to understand the present students’awareness of the current state policy of college scholarships and the actual implementation of the policy effect, field research and interviews has been conducted upon two vocational colleges in Changsha. Taking all aspects of the research, deficiencies have been founded as following value orientation is unclear, identified system is unscientific. At the same time, the executive system in the process of policy implementation is not independent and professional; propaganda work is imperfect, quota allocation system becomes rigid, lacking psychological support and other issues. Compared to the related systems in the United States, Britain, Japan and other developed countries, the following advice has been put forward to China’s current policy reforms:clearing state grants policy values; formulating scientific standards and assessment procedures; clearing the main body in the execution of policy implementation and strengthening its functions;intensifying propaganda; setting up aid policy "package"; increasing the intensity of double-check to establish a long-term supervision mechanism; reinforcing the psychological aids.更多还原