家庭教育投入对教育改革与发展的影响研究

【作者】 陈辉；

【导师】 叶忠；

【作者基本信息】 南京师范大学 ， 教育经济与管理， 2014， 硕士

【副题名】基于4省2000个家庭的数据调查

【摘要】 教育改革与发展需要全社会的支持,社会体系的诸多方面对教育改革与发展产生着不同的影响。家庭教育投入作为教育经费来源的重要方面,同教育改革与发展有着密切联系,关系着教育改革与发展的顺利进行。探究家庭教育投入对教育改革与发展的影响内容与程度具有一定的现实意义和理论意义。本研究以教育改革与发展的二十字方针和家庭教育投入对教育改革与发展的影响内容的契合点为基础,结合实地调研和专家访谈,构建了家庭教育投入对教育改革与发展的影响因素的测量指标体系。研究运用统计软件SPSS19.0,对初步形成的影响因素问卷进行信度和效度检验,以确保研究结论的科学性和可靠性。通过正式实地调研,本研究对4省14所学校的2000个家庭进行了问卷调查。通过对数据进行描述性及推断性统计分析得出：家庭教育投入对教育改革与发展是支持的,但不同维度之间也呈现出较大差异。主要表现为：1.城乡维度,城镇居民的家庭教育投入对教育改革与发展的质量支持显著高于农村居民,农村居民的家庭教育投入要比城镇居民更功利。2.性别维度,家庭针对女孩的教育投入比针对男孩的教育投入对教育改革与发展的支持度更高,主要表现为家庭针对女孩的教育投入资源利用效率要远高于男生。3.地区维度,东部地区在总支持度上要显著高于中部地区；东部和西部地区的家庭教育投入在资源利用效率上高于中部地区；西部地区家庭教育投入的理性倾向显著低于东部地区。4.投入水平维度,一般投入水平的家庭对教育改革与发展的总支持度显著高于低水平的教育投入；一般水平的家庭教育投入对资源利用效率的支持高于低投入水平；低水平的家庭教育投入功利度显著高于高投入水平。5.学段维度,小学学段家庭教育投入对教育改革与发展的总支持度最高,初中学段次之,高中学段最差。在质量支持的维度上呈显出同总支持度同样的规律。在资源利用效率维度上,小学与初中、高中的差异显著,小学的资源利用效率均高于初中和高中。最后,研究指出家庭教育投入对教育改革与发展的支持存在目的支持模糊、资源利用效率低下和投资结构有待优化等问题,指出收入差距过大、家长的教育理念落后和投资能力不足、教育资源配置不均以及教育评价体制束缚是问题产生的原因,最后研究指出提高家庭教育投入对教育改革与发展的支持水平进而保证教育改革与发展的顺利进行,缩小收入差距是根本,优化教育资源配置是基础,更新家长观念是保障,改革教育评价机制是动力。更多还原

【Abstract】 Educational reform and development needs help and support from everyone in society and many aspects of the social system have an effect on it. As an important part of the education funds source, family investment in education has a close relationship with the educational reform and development and is critical to its smooth progress. Therefore, exploring the influence of family education investment on educational reform and development has great practical and theoretical significance.The research is based on the conjunction point of the twenty-word principle of educational reform and development and the influence of family education investment on it. The researcher did field research as well as expert interviews and then built the measurement system which shows the influence of family education investment on educational reform and development. The research tested the reliability and validity of the questionnaire by statistical software SPSS19.0to insure the scientificity and dependability of the research conclusion.The research investigated2,000families from14schools in4provinces by questionnaire. Through the study of the descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of data obtained, the researcher concluded that families’ education investment supports the educational reform and development, but presents a big difference between different dimensions. Firstly, it’s the urban and rural difference. Urban residents’ family education investment to support the quality of education reform and development is significantly higher than that of rural residents. Rural residents’ family education investment is more utilitarian than urban residents. Secondly, it’s the gender difference. Family education investment for girls has stronger influence on education reform and development mainly because its resource use efficiency is much higher than that for boys. Thirdly, it’s the regional difference. The total support level in eastern region is observably higher than that of the central region, the resource use efficiency in eastern and western family education investment is higher than that of the central region, the rationality of the family education investment in western area tend to be significantly lower than that of the eastern region. Fourthly, it’s the investment level difference. The investment level of general families support better to the education reform and development than those low level investment families. The utility degree of low level investment family is significantly higher than that of high investment families. Fifthly, it’s the learning period difference. Family education investment of primary school period support most to the education reform and development, middle school period comes next, and high school period supports least. And the quality support dimension appeared to be the same result. On the dimension of resource use efficiency, significant difference was found in elementary school and junior high school, primary school resources use efficiency were higher than both junior and senior high school.There are problems with family education investment to support the education reform and development, which are fuzzy support purpose, low efficiency in resource utilization and the investment structure is to be optimized, etc. The reasons of these problems are the big income gap, parents’ laggard educational idea, uneven investment capacity, imbalance of the education resources allocation and the constraints of education evaluation system. In order to improve the family education investment’s support level to the education reform and development and ensure its smooth progress, narrowing the income gap is fundamental, optimizing the educational resource allocation is basal, updating parents’ concept is a guarantee and reforming the education evaluation mechanism is the motivation.更多还原