【作者】 王海涛；

【导师】 王世涛；

【作者基本信息】 大连海事大学 ， 法律， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 言论自由的基本理论经过了漫长时间的发展,在该概念刚刚提出的雅典城邦时期,所谓言论自由仅指公民参与议会发言的政治权利；随着资产阶级革命的兴起,言论自由的思想开始被纳入政治理论,并作为一项公民基本权利写入宪法；第二次世界大战以后,对言论自由的限度有了更深刻的认识,逐渐形成了对其保护与限制的适用原则。目前,利益权衡原则成为各国解决言论自由边界的主流方法,但是在不同利益或价值间究竟如何权衡,在不同国家,不同法律环境,不同社会背景下显著不同。言论自由的价值主要体现在实现个人价值、促进民主政治、追求和发现真理等方面,价值取向的不同立场影响着其限制的边界。我国宪法对言论自由的概念、性质、价值取向规定的较为模糊,在立法、司法中的欠缺指导意义。通过对国内外相同性质案例的比较,探讨言论自由在形式上不仅限于纯粹的言论,具有表达性质的行为即象征性言论也应作为言论自由的形式加以保护：在保护内容上应区别政治性言论和一般言论分别加以保护,给予政治性言论更广阔的自由空间。全文分为引言、正文、结论三部分。正文分为四个部分,第一部分概述言论自由的概念、性质、发展历史,探讨言论自由的理论基。第二部分分析了保护言论自由实现的价值,从价值角度阐述保障言论自由的重要性,指出对言论自由进行保护的必要性。第三部分论证了对言论自由限制的法理基础,提出对言论自由限制的原则。第四部分分析了我国公民言论自由保护的现状,指出了其不足之处,对完善我国公民言论自由提出了笔者的建议,希望能对保障我国公民言论自由权有所帮助。更多还原

【Abstract】 The development of basic theory of freedom of speech is a long process. In Athens city-state period when the concept had just raised, the so-called speech freedom is referred only to the political rights of citizens’ speech in Parliament. However, with the rise of the bourgeois revolution, the thought of speech freedom began to be incorporated into the political theory, and was written into Constitution as a citizen’s basic right. After the Second World War, people had more profound understanding about limits of speech freedom, and gradually formed the principles of protection and restrictions. At present, principle of interests balance becomes main method to solve problems of speech freedom boundary among countries, but in different countries, different legal environment, different social background, how to balance different interests is significantly different. The value of speech freedom is mainly embodied in the realization of personal value, promotion of democracy, and pursuit of truth, different standpoint of above aspects orientation influences its limit boundary. In China’s Constitution, previsions about concepts, property and value orientation of speech freedom are quite vague, which lack directive significance in judicature and legislation. By comparing domestic and foreign cases of same properties, the following conclusions can be arrived. Speech freedom is not only pure speech in form, symbolic speech also should be protected as a form of speech freedom. political speech and general words should be distinguished in protection content and protected respectively, political speech should be given the broader free space.更多还原