【作者】 王芳；

【导师】 刘贵福；

【作者基本信息】 辽宁师范大学 ， 中国近现代史， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 胡适和丁文江二人是近代中国历史上知名的学者，丁文江是中国最早的地质教学机构和地质研究机构的创建者，是中国近代地质学界的开山人物，胡适则是新文化运动的领袖。丁、胡二人虽不是政治家，但都一生关心政治，议论政治，丁文江并有投身政治的实践活动。二人有共同的自由主义思想基础，但在具体的政治问题上，却有同有异，反应出中国自由主义的多样面相，对二人思想做比较的研究，一方面可以加深对丁文江、胡适思想的认识，同时更有助于我们加深对1920年代和1930年代的中国自由主义的认识。全文第一部分是引言，概括介绍丁文江与胡适二人的思想背景、思想交往。介绍与文章论题的研究意义、研究现状及研究方法。第一章围绕“好人政府”问题，介绍丁文江与胡适展开的讨论及实践。1922年二人创办的《努力》周报，议论时政，他们共同关注的问题就是改造中国走什么道路的问题，围绕好人政府，《努力》周报进行了讨论，丁、胡二人对“好人”当政模式下的政府性质、政府组织原则、好政府党的建立与否等问题上进行了讨论，丁文江并以出任“淞沪督办”总办做了一个好人从政的尝试。第二章主要讨论丁文江与胡适在日本侵华后，对国共内战与抗日问题的讨论。在日本侵华的大背景下，他们都坚决反对国民党进行反共内战，但是对待日本的态度，却存在一个由低调妥协到积极抗战的变化过程。第三章主要讨论在1930年代著名的“民主与独裁大讨论”中，丁文江和胡适的观点，讨论胡适提倡“幼稚民主论”，丁文江主张的威权主义的“新式独裁”的区别。第四章是在前三部分的基础之上，尝试解析丁文江与胡适在政治思想上存在这些同异的原因。全文的最后一部分是结语。对全文的观点做一个简单的总结。更多还原

【Abstract】 Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi are renowned scholars in modern China,Ding Wenjiang is thefounder of China’s first geological teaching institutions and geological research institutions, isthe modern the Chinese geology industry pioneer，Hu Shi is the leader of the New CultureMovement.Although they are not politician, they are very concerned about politics and theydiscuss about politics in all their life.And Ding Wenjiang have had practical activities inpolitics.Although they have the common foundation of the liberal idea,there are differenciesas well as similarities in politics which react the varieties of chinese liberalism.Researchingtheir idea comparly,one side,it can deepen our cognition of them,in the meantime,it candeepen our cognition of chinese liberalism in1920s and1930s.The first part of the full text is the introduction, an overview of the time, place, and itsapproximate relationship of the two ideological background Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi,substantially exchanges and the political. In addition, the significance of a brief introductionand article topics, current research and research methods.The first chapter focuses on the "good government" problem, discuss and practiceintroduced Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi.In1922two people jointly founded the "hard" weeklypublication, their question they both concern is the transformation of Chinese society takewhat kind of road, in the midst of revolution and improvement, two of people chose the latter;second problems, the main problem is also during this period, they focus on is the "good guysthe government issues", from "good" in their mode of the nature of the government,government organization, government of Party building and other issues were discussed, andby Ding Wenjiang as "Shanghai office to" try a practice.Chapter II Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi, with the current events at home and abroad in the1930s linked very closely because of the manner in which the center of gravity of the concernof the two. In the context of Japan’s invasion of China, they are firmly opposed to the civilwar between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, but the attitude towards Japan, thereis a low-key compromise to the active resistance of the process of change, the only doer DingWenjiang transition much earlier than Hu.The third chapter is very well-known "Democracy and Dictatorship discussion" about the1930s, Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi deeply involved, and this time is the two opinions rarethere is a big differences, Hu Shi advocated "naive democratic theory, Ding Wenjiangcontinuation of the "good government" point of view, advocated a "new dictatorship".Chapter IV in the first three parts of the research foundation, try parsing of DingWenjiang with Hu political and ideological similarity and difference are the reasons.The last part of the full text is the conclusion. Summarized the Ding Hu duo political andideological differences and similarities, and pointed out the significance of the study.更多还原