【作者】 周晶；

【导师】 姜战军；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 民商法学， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 侵害生命权的行为会导致受害人生命丧失和死者近亲属物质、精神利益遭受损害的双重损害事实，死者与近亲属都应该获得赔偿，但是由于生命权的特殊性以及受制于传统的权利主体资格理论，我国现有的有关死亡赔偿的法律以及学界主流观点都认为死亡赔偿是对近亲属的赔偿，死者生命本体没有可赔偿性。生命权作为人之最重要最基本的权利在受到侵害时却没有相应的民事救济，这与生命之崇高性形成悖论，与世人之情感相背离，更重要的是给社会带来不好的价值导向。为了更加完善有力的保障生命权，为了适应社会的需求，笔者从现行死亡赔偿制度的弊端入手，在介绍和评析相关理论的基础上，通过对传统权利能力理论产生背景及现实困境的层层剖析，肯定了死者生命权救济的必要性和可能行，对死亡损害赔偿理论进行了重构，在此基础上构建了对死者赔偿和对近亲属赔偿并存的死亡损害赔偿制度。本文分为四部分，第一部分通过对现行死亡损害赔偿相关立法的梳理，总结出了现行死亡赔偿制度的主要内容和存在的主要问题。第二部分主要介绍了有关死亡损害赔偿的两种主要理论基础近亲属逸失利益说和死者生命损失说，并对两种理论基础进行了评析。第三部分从死者生命权救济的必要性和可能性以及比较法上的相关规定及实践三方面论证了对死者生命本身进行赔偿是合理选择，同时也探讨了近亲属损害赔偿请求权的理论基础。第四部分是对我国死亡损害赔偿制度的具体设想，构建了对死者赔偿和对近亲属赔偿并存的制度，并具体设置了各个赔偿项目和赔偿标准。更多还原

【Abstract】 Violations of the right to life will cause dual fact of damage, which refers to the deathof the victim with the material and spiritual damages of the immediate relatives of thedead. They both deserve compensation. However, due to the particularity of the right tolife within the context of the classical theory of legal capacity, our existing compensationsystem for death as well as the mainstream viewpoint of academia holds thatcompensation for death aims at the damages of the immediate relatives of the dead whilethe death is not compensable. The right to life is always considered as the most importantand fundamental one of human beings. The fact that it is infringed without anycorresponding civil remedy could be a disrespect of the nobility of life and humanemotions bringing meanwhile the society bad value orientation. In order to fully protectthe right to life and better meet the social needs, the author represents the disadvantages ofthe existing compensation system and then introduces the related theory by proving thenecessity and the feasibility of provisions for death compensation trying to revise thecompensation system for death to make both the death and the damages of the immediaterelatives compensable.This paper is divided into four parts. The first part tries to clarify the main contentand problems of the existing compensation system for death based on a summary of therelevant legislations. The second part mainly presents and analyses two main theoreticalfoundations constituting the compensation system for death. The third part demonstratesthe rationality of compensation for the dead with three arguments, including the necessityand possibility of the compensation for the dead, related regulations from the perspectiveof comparative legal studies and relevant cases generating from legal practice. Meanwhile,this part also discusses the theoretical basis of rights enjoyed by relatives to claim aremedy for damages. Finally, the fourth part tries to propose some specific suggestions forthe existing compensation system for death in current China, including the setting up ofspecific indemnification standards according to different categories of the damage, thusestablishing the regime of compensation both for the dead and the immediate relatives.更多还原