南京保卫战牺牲将领争议研究

【作者】 赵媛媛；

【导师】 朱成山；

【作者基本信息】 南京师范大学 ， 中共党史， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 南京保卫战是国民革命军在抗日战争时期淞沪会战失利后,保卫当时的国民政府首都南京的一次重要战役。虽然历史已经过去七十五周年有余,但是关于这段历史的研究和探索仍在继续。特别是随着南京大屠杀研究的深入,一直以来被研究学者作为南京大屠杀发生背景而一笔带过的“南京保卫战”也渐渐进入学界视野,并逐渐成为一个独立的研究课题。现存关于南京保卫战牺牲将领的研究存在着某些争议,值得我们进行深入研究和探讨。本文首先介绍了南京保卫战牺牲将领争议研究的背景,通过对南京保卫战研究变化以及成果的对比,提出有关南京保卫战牺牲将领的争议。然后,对南京保卫战牺牲将领的争议进行了研究,这也是本文的核心内容。对各研究单位发布的几份交叉但不重叠的南京保卫战牺牲将领名单提出自己的疑问,通过大量查阅历史资料和档案,特别是对最具史学权威的国民政府请恤调查表进行反复的研读,参考牺牲将军后人的口述史资料,以及权威研究单位的最新认证,试图给出最为公正的南京保卫战牺牲将领名单,对历史人物的身份呈现出更加准确的界定。同时还将对关于南京保卫战牺牲将领具体牺牲地点的几种矛盾说法以及南京保卫战周边战场的争议进行论述。最后,主要总结了南京保卫战牺牲将领争议研究过程中的思考与启示。通过关于南京保卫战牺牲将领争议研究的思考,得出历史研究需遵循党的“实事求是”思想路线、牺牲将领争议研究是为了还原历史真相、以及对历史人物应给予历史的定位与评价的几点历史启示。还指出南京保卫战牺牲将领争议研究的现实意义,是为了反击日本右翼否定历史的企图、进而进一步廓清和维护抗日战争史实、以及促进相关史学研究深入开展。最后,列出南京保卫战牺牲将领争议研究有三个方面的价值拓展,即弘扬爱国主义精神的需要、正确传承历史的需要和为牺牲将领树碑立传的需要。更多还原

【Abstract】 The defending battle of Nanking is the national revolutionary army after the Songhu battle during the Anti-Japanese War. This defense battle was an important war, because the city of Nanking was the capital of the Chinese national government. Although it has gone for more than75years, the study of this history and the discovery of historical achievement is still continue. Especially, with the deepening of the Nanking massacre research, scholars have long been research as a background of the Nanking massacre occurred in Nanking, also gradually into the academic field of vision, and gradually become an independent research subject. General research about the Nanking battle sacrifice still has some controversies, worthy of our in-depth study and discussion.This thesis mainly through three parts:firstly, describes the research background, Nanking battle sacrifices generals disputed by Nanking battle research changes and results comparison, put forward about the battle of Nanking sacrifice generals disputed. Secondly, the battle of Nanking, the sacrifice of generals dispute, also is the core content of this article. For each research unit issued a few cross overlapping but not the battle of Nanking sacrifice general list proposed own question, through a lot of access to historical data and documents, especially the authority files from the Second Historical Archives, general reference to sacrifice the posterity of oral history data, and the latest certification authority research unit, try to give the most fair Nanking battle list of sacrifice generals, to the identity of the historical figures present a more accurate definition. Will also be about Nanking battle several contradictions that sacrifice generals to specific locations and controversy around Nanking battle field was discussed. At last, the thesis is about influence of Nanking battle sacrifices generals disputed research thinking and enlightenment, and respectively from the factors that influence the controversial general study sacrifice generals to research the role of the dispute, and sacrifice the research of general debate, these three aspects are discussed.更多还原