【作者】 张旭；

【导师】 李丽峰；

【作者基本信息】 辽宁大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 构建和谐社会是目前我国社会发展的重要目标，为了实现社会和谐，纠纷的解决机制就显得尤为重要。在实践中，司法机关在解决纠纷的过程中扮演了重要的角色，然而庞大的案件数量、巨大的审判压力使得有限的司法资源难以应对。为了缓解“诉讼爆炸”，提高纠纷解决的效率，2009年最高人民法院发布了《最高人民法院关于建立健全诉讼与非诉讼相衔接的矛盾纠纷解决机制的若干意见》，以发展非诉讼纠纷解决机制来配合人民法院做好民众的纠纷解决工作。2010年，在河南郑州举办了“推进诉讼与仲裁工作相衔接高端论坛”，拉开了完善诉讼与仲裁相衔接的序幕。民事诉讼与仲裁是目前我国多元化纠纷解决机制的两大主流途径，然而二者并非完全独立、互不联系。诉讼具有国家性和司法性的特点，而仲裁则更倾向于民间性和自治性，二者的性质决定了其在定纷止争的过程中发挥着不同的作用。而仲裁作为一种民间的自治行为，既需要国家司法机关的支持与协助，又需要在国家法制的框架内予以审查和监督。本文主要通过对比《民事诉讼法》和《仲裁法》以及相关的司法解释，发现现行法律中有关民事诉讼与仲裁衔接存在的问题，并借鉴国外先进的立法经验，提出完善我国诉讼与仲裁衔接机制的建议。文章首先对相关的概念和原理进行了必要的分析，在此基础上，阐述了现阶段研究民事诉讼与仲裁衔接的必要性。本文的主体部分结合了最新修订的《民事诉讼法》和《仲裁法》以及相关司法解释，对目前我国民事诉讼和仲裁的衔接状况进行了深入剖析，并提出了衔接过程中存在的几个比较重要的问题，如仲裁协议内容的审查、保全程序、重新仲裁程序以及撤销仲裁裁决的程序等。通过借鉴国外先进的立法经验和立法指导思想，提出了完善我国民事诉讼与仲裁衔接的总体思路，并且具体问题具体分析，进一步明确对所提出问题的完善对策。更多还原

【Abstract】 At present, building a harmonious society is the main goal of social development inChina. In order to achieve social harmony, dispute settlement mechanism is particularlyimportant. In practice, judicial authorities play an important role in the disputesettlement process. However, the limited judicial resources have hardly supported largenumber of lawsuits and huge pressure to judicial trail. In order to alleviate “litigationexplosion” and improve the efficiency of dispute resolution, in2009, China’s SupremeCourt rolled out The supreme people’s court’s several opinions about establishing andimproving disputes settlement mechanism connecting litigation and non-litigation. In2010,“high-end forumsabout proceeding connection of litigation and arbitration” washeld in Zhengzhou city Henan province, in order to develop alternative disputeresolution(ADR) to cooperate people’s court to settle disputes. Civil litigation andarbitration are now two main approach of diverse resolution mechanism in China,however, they both are not completely independent. Litigation has the characteristics ofnation and judicial, but arbitration is more inclined to folk and autonomy. Differentnatures make different roles they play in settling disputes. As a kind of folk autonomousbehavior, arbitration need both support and assistance from national judicial authorities,and censorship and supervision under the framework of legal system.In this paper, by comparing the civil procedure law, arbitration law and related judicialexplanation, the author find questions about connection of civil litigation and arbitration,and draw lessons from advanced experience of other countries, then put forward somesuggestions of improving connection mechanism of litigation and arbitration in China.Firstly this paper mainly analyzes relevant concepts and principles. Based on that, thispaper states the necessity of research on the connection of civil litigation and arbitrationat the present stage. According to the latest civil procedure law and arbitration law andrelevant judicial explanation, this paper analyzes deeply the current connection stateof civil litigation and arbitration in China, and put forward some important problems inthe process of connection, such as reviewing the arbitration agreement, preventiveproceeding, arbitration procedure again, the procedure of revocation and so on. Bydrawing lessons from foreign advanced legislation experience, this paper puts forwardthe overall thought of improving connection of our countries’ civil lawsuit andarbitration, and specific issues specific analysis, further clear measures to proposed problems.更多还原