刑事庭前会议制度研究

【作者】 张杰；

【导师】 周宝峰；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 法律， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 刑事庭前会议是法官主动或者依据控、辩各方的申请在审判前召集召开,由各方诉讼参与人参加的旨在解决与庭审活动密切相关,但非庭审活动本身之程序及实体问题的庭审前准备会议,就证据开示问题、非法证据排除问题、以及有关诉讼参与人的申请、异议问题在庭审活动前预先作出处理,并通过会议缩小分歧范围及庭审审理范围,明确庭审争执点,并形成具有法律效力的决议的诉讼活动,其制度构建的实质意义在于服务于庭审。具有保障审判公正、保障审判顺利进行,提高审判效率,及对公诉权进行制约保障被告人权利等重要的程序法价值。刑事庭前会议是刑事庭前程序中相对独立、功能集中,作用明显、地位突出的一个环节。我国刑事审判司法实践中,一直有关于施行刑事庭前会议制度的有益探索,这为庭前会议制度的立法奠定了基础。民事诉讼立法、司法实践对刑事诉讼法庭前会议制度的构建起到了一定的借鉴和推动作用。2012年修正的刑事诉讼法确立的庭前会议制度规范过于原则和概括,未将证据开示在庭前会议审议事项中明确是最大的缺陷。相比西方法治发达国家,我国的庭前会议制度在庭前会议在具体运作模式、效力、证据开示、非法证据排除等制度构建方面均有欠缺。进一步完善庭前会议制度,应当在司法实践中总结经验,在明确完善庭前会议制度程序的必要性和应依据的原则的基础上,在制度构建上明确庭前会议活动的法律效力、明确提起庭前会议的主体,设置完善的审理程序,设置庭前会议审理的专门机构,确立并完善庭前证据开示制度及非法证据排除相关制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 Criminal Pretrial Conference is a kind of pre-trial preparation meeting held by the judge of his own motive or based on the prosecution and defense applying for, in which participants present aim at resolving problems closely related to the trial but not to the procedure of the trial itself or any substantive issues. During the conference, issues such as exposing evidence, excluding illegal evidence, as well as the participants’applications or objections will be handled in advance. According to the meeting, range of dispute will be contracted and main point will be confirmed. Eventually, it will become a litigation activity with legal force. The real significance of the system construction is to serve the court hearing, making the trial fair, ensuring the trial carried out smoothly and improving the efficiency of the trial. What’s more, the system also restricts the right of prosecution and protects the rights of the accused. The Criminal Pretrial Conference is an important process which is relatively independent and concentrated functional. In the practice of China’s criminal trial, useful exploring experience has been being gained about the criminal pre-trial conference system, which laid a solid foundation for the legislation of the trial conference system. In addition, legislation of civil litigation and judicial practice had a positive effect on the system. The established rules and norms in the pre-trial conference of the Code of Criminal Litigation amended in2012are not specific enough as it didn’t show clearly how the evidence would be displayed, which is the biggest flaw in the pre-trial conference.Compared to Western developed countries, the construction of China’s pre-trial meeting system is still lacking in the mode of operation, effectiveness, evidence display and excluding illegal evidence. In order to further improve the system of pre-trial conference, experts should sum up experience in judicial practice. In addition, clear the legal effect of the system and the main part of the pre-trial session based on the basic principles. Furthermore, a complete trial procedure and specialized agencies must be set, including systems involved in evidence discovery system and excluding illegal evidence.更多还原