我国公司僵局救济制度之评析

【作者】 马静；

【导师】 王春梅； 程显波；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 法律， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 通常情况下，公司都会处在正常的运转过程中，由此实现和满足股东的利益需求。但有些时候，公司存续过程中可能在公司的股东、董事或管理人员之间出现决策上的分歧或利益冲突，这种分歧或者冲突极端化时可能导致公司权力和决策机构处于瘫痪，这即表明公司陷入了僵局。在公司陷入僵局时，其自身无法破解，需要立法做出规制和解决。但是由于我国《公司法》及其司法解释缺乏明确和细致的规定，导致我国当前关于公司僵局问题的处理形式纷呈，司法实务时有混乱。本文对我国《公司法》在公司僵局救济方面的发展进行了实证性的分析与梳理，以三个不同阶段的案例为切入点，以去同存异的方式将案例中体现的在我国司法实践中对于公司僵局处理上出现的问题加以归纳与分析，提炼出存在于现阶段的争议分歧和审判盲点，进行深入的理论分析，进而得出解决办法和相应的救济路径，旨在完善我国公司僵局问题立法的规定，并对司法实务提出救济机制上的填补与完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 Usually, the company is always operating well in order to complish and satisfy thebenefit of shareholders. But sometimes, conflit between shareholder, director andmanager on decision-making or benefit will leads to the organ of authority and decisionshutdown, which means the company comes to the deadlock. Underneath this situation,company are not able to deal with it by itself but need the legislation. However, becauseof lack of clear and detailed regulation in company law of China, the judicial practice isvery confused and puzzled.According to chaotic solution of Deadlock being used and disordered judicialpractice currently in China, the writer analyzes the relief systerm development forDeadlock by empirical study. Through the three cases which happened in differentperiod as starting point, we are able to find and conclude the controversies upon dealingproblem of Deadlock in China. The first part of this article mainly contains the contentsand results of cases. The second part abstracts the disputed point and blind spot existedresently by comparing with all these three cases listed above. The last part focuses onthe resolution and relief systerm design for Deadlock based on the argument in theoryand practice. By analyzing three representitive cases, the goal is to clarify the legislativedevelopment sequence and perfect the relief framework for Deadlock in China.更多还原