【作者】 李明明；

【导师】 赵丙贵；

【作者基本信息】 辽宁大学 ， 法律， 2012， 硕士

【副题名】以浙江吴英集资诈骗罪为视角

【摘要】 2011年十月一日前后,国内外各家财经新闻媒体都在报道温州民间借贷陷入困境的消息。在困境的背后,庞大的民间借贷市场越来越多的受到人们关注。不仅是在温州,也不仅限于浙江,在江苏、福建、河南、内蒙古等地民间借贷的规模也极为庞大。伴随着民间借贷的空前活跃,与其相关的金融犯罪时有发生,尤其是集资诈骗犯罪频发。根据公安部部门一份数据显示,2008年以来,全国公安机关共破获非法集资(含非法吸收公众存款和集资诈骗)案件5000余起,非法集资类案件每年增加约2000起、集资额增加约200亿元,其中又以浙江吴英集资诈骗案最为人们所关注。本文旨在以浙江吴英集资诈骗罪为视角,对我国目前集资诈骗罪的认定进行探讨。本文共分为三个部分,第一部分主要是对集资诈骗罪中“非法占有目的”的认定。首先详细分析了我国目前集资诈骗罪中非法占有目的的认定标准,然后结合浙江吴英集资诈骗案,提出我国现有认定标准的不足之处,最后对非法占有目的做出重新认识。第二部分结构分成两小部分,分别对集资诈骗罪中“诈骗方法”和“非法集资”的认定标准、实务中存在的不足之处进行分析,并且提出自己的见解。第三部分主要是对集资诈骗罪中犯罪数额的认定的探讨。本部分主要是通过对实务中常用的认定标准的分析和认识,进而探讨犯罪数额的具体界限,期待获得更加深刻的理解。更多还原

【Abstract】 Before and after October1,2011, at home and abroad each financial news media reported the news of the Wenzhou private lending trouble. A large, private lending market has attracted more and more attention. Not only in Wenzhou, is not limited to Zhejiang, very large scale in Jiangsu, Fujian, Henan, Inner Mongolia and other places of private lending. Along with private lending is more active than ever, associated with financial crime, especially financial fraud and crime-prone. A Ministry of Public Security data show that since2008, public security organs cracked a total of illegal fund-raising (including illegal deposits from the public and fund-raising fraud) more than5,000cases of illegal fund-raising the size of the class of cases per year about2000, funds raised20billion yuan increasing rapidly. Fraud in particular,Wu Ying, Zhejiang. This paper seeks to Zhejiang Wu Ying crime of fraud as the angle of view, at present to our country the cognizance of the crime of fraud is discussed.This article is divided into three parts, first part is the identification of financial fraud,"the purpose of illegal possession". First detailed analysis of a new understanding of our current fund-raising purpose of illegal possession of that standard to defraud, then in Zhejiang Wu Ying fund-raising fraud, raised the inadequacies of our existing recognized standards, the last made for the purpose of illegal possession.The second part structure is divided into two parts, respectively on the crime of fraud of fraud" and" illegal fund-raising" standards, practice of the deficiencies in the analysis, and put forward their own views.The third part is mainly to raise funds to defraud the amount of crime identified the Discussion. This section is mainly for the understanding of the practice identification, and then explore the specific boundaries of the amount of crime and look forward to have a more profound understanding.更多还原