【作者】 张平；

【导师】 刘天佐；

【作者基本信息】 湖南农业大学 ， 高等教育学， 2012， 硕士

【副题名】基于资源依赖理论的视角

【摘要】 自从高等教育扩招以来,高校规模持续扩大,教育成本迅速增长。政府无法像“精英主义”时期那样全揽高校运行费用,多元投资主体的出现在一定程度上保障了高等教育的正常运行。高校与各投资主体之间的合作动因、关系形成与运行发展,决定了高校办学行为的复杂性和多样性。本文在资源依赖理论的视角下,基于对N大学校史与相关财务资料分析与深度访谈的基础上,诠释了高校与各投资主体的资源交换、相互依赖、权力制衡对高校办学行为产生的影响。首先,研究从历史发展的角度梳理了我国教育经费制度的变迁过程,分析了高校经费来源结构的变革。研究发现,高校与多元供给主体的关系变化,主要是高校与政府间的“上下级”关系逐渐削弱；高校与合同者之间的“合作”关系的扩大以及高校与学生群体之间的“主顾”关系的增强。然后,研究以N大学为案例做进一步探讨,通过在经费结构改变的影响下,对该校的组织管理体制、办学规模、招生计划、专业结构设置和教师科研行为变化的角度进行了分析并验证了假设结果。研究得出,政府的政策导向和财政拨款激励措施的刺激,推动了学校规模的增长；专业收费标准差异的收费政策,改变了学校招生计划的投向；市场需求好、培养成本低的专业,成为高校专业发展的重点,导致这些专业得到快速发展。国家科研事业的项目化和横向科研事业收入拉开了教师收入水平的差距,并影响了教师个人时间分配与努力方向。更多还原

【Abstract】 Due to the increasing enrollment and enlarging scale of universities, the cost of higher education rise rapidly. Government is not able to bear the expense of higher education entirely as in the period of "elitism". The emergences of multi-funding investors release the problem and protect the normal operation of university to some extent. The cooperation and relation between universities and investors generate the diversity and flexibility of university behavior.Based on theory of resource dependence, the history and financial information of N university and in-depth interview, this paper study the influence on university educational behavior for resource exchange, mutual dependence and power balance between universities and investors.This paper first explains the reform of funding system of China from the view of historical development, and analyses the transform in financial structure of university. The study reveals that the consequence of "multichannel-funding" are:first of all, the weakening rank relationship between government and universities; the expansion of cooperation relationship between universities and covenanters; the strengthening "server-consumer" relationship between university and studentsAfter this, the paper conducts a case study of N university to further probe the influence of transform of funding structure on school organization, university size, major settings, recruiting scheme and scientific researches of staff, and proves the theoretical analysis assumes. Finally this paper shows that government’s policy direction and stimulation of funding promote the growth of the university size; the charges policy according to the different major charging standards change university ’s recruitment plan; the major with good market promising and low training cost become development priority, leading to those majors rapid inflation; the national scientific research project management and horizontal scientific research business income space out the distance gap of teachers income, influence the personal time distribution and the effort to teachers self-development direction.更多还原