【作者】 付瑶；

【导师】 闵春雷；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 法律， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 自由心证制度是各国普遍采用的证据评价原则,但由于各方面的原因,我国对自由心证制度存在一定的误解,也影响了司法合理化的进程。对这一问题进行探讨对于纠正错误观念,推动我国刑事司法改革有着极为重要的意义。第一章自由心证概述中写明,自由心证制度是在对法定证据制度的反思过程中形成并发展的。自由心证制度具有其自身的价值,其有利于发挥法官的主观能动性;保证了内心确信的较高证明标准,保证了证明活动的科学性及结果的可靠性;也有利于案件事实的认定。第二章自由心证在我国的现状及问题中认为,我国立法中不存在自由心证的规定,刑事司法证明以印证证明方式为主要模式。印证证明模式要求证据之间的相互印证、支持,自身存在诸多缺陷。另一方面,在我国的司法实践中实际上存在着自由心证的运用。本章还对于我国现存的证据制度存在的问题进行了分析。例如某些案件难以定罪、程序正义让位于客观真实目标的追求、刑讯逼供难以根治、法官自由裁量权滥用等。第三章我国构建自由心证制度的可行性分析中认为,自由心证制度在我国刑事诉讼中的确立的具有可行性。自由心证制度在我国刑事诉讼中的确立具有相应的社会条件、理论环境和立法与司法方面的条件。当然,依据我国的现实情况,在我国确立自由心证制度还有许多难题。例如法官缺乏独立性、证据规则体系不完善、追求实事求是的单一证明标准、直接言词原则难以贯彻、刑事判决不说明理由等。第四章构建我国自由心证制度的设想中指出,我国构建自由心证制度在总体思路上应当适当借鉴国外经验。自由心证制度的构建需要相关制度的完善,因此,我国刑事诉讼中构建自由心证制度应当稳步推进。并且需要完善诸如法官独立审判、直接言词原则、证据规则、证明标准等各种制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 Free proof is an evidence-evaluation principle widely adopted by many countries. However, due to various reasons, there are some misunderstandings toward this principle in China, which also influences the process of judicial rationalization negatively. Research in this subject is of great importance in correcting false concepts and promoting the judicial reform of criminal litigation in China.The first chapter points out that,the establishment and development of modern free proof. The free proof is formed and developed in the course of against the evidence system of legal system. The free proof system has its own value. The free proof system can play to the judges’ subjective initiative. The free proof that the inner system guarantee high standard of proof that the activities that the reliability of the scientific nature, but also to the verification of the case.The second chapter points out that,the legislation in China is not present in the provisions of the free proof. Verification Proof is the main mode of the Criminal judicial documents. Verification Proof require verification and support among the evidences. Verification Proof has many defects. On the other hand, in our country’s judicial practice exist in the use of free proof in fact. The chapter which is talking about evidence of our country’s existing problems in the system is analyzed. For example, some cases difficult to convicted procedure justice to the pursuit of objective truth, to eradicate torture, abuse of discretion of the judge, etc. The third chapter points out that, the free proof system in our country’s criminal procedure of the establishment of the feasible. Our country’s criminal procedure of the free proof system has the establishment of corresponding social conditions, theory and legislation and judicial environment conditions. Of course, according to the reality in China, established in our country free proof system have many problems. For example the judge lack independence, evidence rules system is not perfected, the pursuit of seeking truth from facts of a single standards of proof, difficult to implement, direct words do not explain the reasons for criminal judgments.Chapter forth points out, in the construction of the free proof system in general thought shall be appropriately on the experience abroad. The free proof system of the construction of the need to perfect the related system, therefore, the construction of our country’s criminal procedure free proof system should advance steadily. Such as the judge needs to perfect independent trial, the principle of direct verbal trial, evidence rules, standards of proof, etc.更多还原