论我国建筑物区分所有权的权利体系

【作者】 李华；

【导师】 王艳华；

【作者基本信息】 郑州大学 ， 民商法， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 近些年来,随着房地产行业的持续升温,人们之间的居住关系发生了很大变化。带有计划经济色彩的单位“大院”逐渐消失在人们的视野,取而代之的是商品经济色彩浓厚的“小区”。在业主、开发商、物业管理人和土地所有人之间上演着越来越多的权利纠纷事件,人们在“小区”内的权利义务关系变得更为复杂和纠结。由此,无论是立法者、司法者、法学研究者,还是其他非从事法律职业的居民,都有越来越多的人开始关注建筑物区分所有权法律制度,并试图从中得到于自己有用的答案。我国《物权法》已于2007年施行,里面的第六章专门对业主的建筑物区分所有权进行规定,但是建筑物区分所有权法律制度的理论体系至今并未完全定型,在很多问题上仍是见仁见智,莫衷一是。在此背景下本文也把视角投向建筑物区分所有权法律制度,通过对我国该制度的理论体系的梳理和分析,以期对相关的研究有所裨益。本文的第一部分概述了建筑物区分所有权的概念、涵义及性质,回顾了建筑物区分所有权制度的历史演变,是本文的综述部分。在本部分笔者系统分析了一元论说、二元论说、新一元论说和三元论说的理论,认为三元说是可取的,并进一步指出了研究该项法律制度的积极意义。在第二部分分析了专有权的概念、性质、特征及受到的特别限制,认为专有权是建筑物区分所有权中的本源性权利,是共有权和成员权产生的基础。基于区分所有人之问的密切关系,专有权受到诸多特别限制。本文的第三部分分析了共有权的概念涵义、法律属性、客体范围及其行使的限制,并指出应该根据不同的建筑物区别是共同共有还是按份共有。本文在最后一部分阐述了成员权,认为成员权虽然具有人法的特征,本质上却属于物权,并进一步分析了它与股东权的相似和区别之处。同时着重分析了成员权中表决权利的立法现状,并提出建议。总的来说,专有权、共有权和成员权一起构成了我国建筑物区分所有权制度的理论体系,是建筑物区分所有权制度的三大基本要素。这是分析研究建筑物区分所有权的关键。只有以此为理论架构,我国在相关问题上的立法和司法上的问题才可得以渐进圆满的解决。更多还原

【Abstract】 In recent years, with the real estate industry continues to heat up, the hot real estate, living relationship between people, great changes have taken place. Units with a planned economy, "compound" gradually disappeared from view, replaced by a commodity economy, strong taste of the "community." Of the owners, developers, property managers and owners of land between the right to put on more and more disputes in the event, people in the "cell" within the rights and obligations become more complex and entangled. Thus, both legislators, judiciary, academics, or other non-residents in the legal profession, there are more and more people are concerned about the legal system of condominium ownership, and trying to get get useful answers on their own. China’s "Property Law" was implemented in 2007, which the owners of the sixth chapter of the provisions of condominium ownership, condominium ownership, but the theoretical system of the legal system has not been fully finalized, many issues are still a matter of opinion no agreement. In this context, this perspective is also to invest in condominium ownership to the legal system, the system through the theoretical system of sorting out and analysis of relevant research in order to be useful.The first part of this paper outlines the concept of condominium ownership, meaning and nature of the review of condominium ownership in the history of evolution is the Summary section of this article. In this part, the author systematically analyzes the dollar, saying, binary discourse, the new unitary discourse and ternary discourse theory is desirable that the ternary, and further noted that the study of the positive significance of the legal system. In the second part of the exclusive rights to the concept, nature, characteristics and by the special restrictions that the exclusive rights of ownership in a condominium the right of the origin, is the co-ownership and the right to have members of the foundation. Based on the close relationship between all distinction, subject to many exclusive special restrictions. The third part of this article analyzes the meaning of the concept of co-ownership, legal attributes, scope and object of the exercise of the restrictions, and that the building should be based on the difference between the different joint tenancy or by shares. This paper describes the members in the last part right, that the members of the right, while having the characteristics of personal law, in essence, they are right, and further analysis of its shareholder rights and the similarities and differences between. Also analyzes the voting rights of members of the legislative power in the situation and make recommendations. Overall, the exclusive right of the right and the right together with members of condominium ownership constitutes a system of theoretical system Ownership of the three basic elements. This is the analysis of the key to condominium ownership. Only on this theoretical framework, the issue of the relevant legislative and judicial issues can be satisfactorily resolved gradually.更多还原